Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAHESH APPASAHEB HANCHALE AND ORSversusSANSKRUTI STONE CRUSHER AND M SAND THR ITS PROPRIETOR AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court held that the intervention application is allowed.

Summary

The applicants Mahesh Appasaheb Hanchale and others filed an interim application seeking to intervene in Writ Petition No. 4769 of 2023, which was originally filed by Sanskruti Stone Crusher and M Sand. The petition concerned a dispute with Grampanchayat Nool and its Sarpanch. The court examined whether the applicants had the right to intervene in the pending writ petition. After considering the procedural aspects, the bench allowed the intervention application. Consequently, the applicants were permitted to become parties to the writ proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicants are entitled to intervene in the pending writ petition.

Subjects

  • intervention
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:8066-DB

                                                                       22-IA-11041-2025(C).doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11041 OF 2025
                                                   IN
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 4769 OF 2023

               Mahesh Appasaheb Hanchale And Others                      ...Applicants
               IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
               Sanskruti Stone Crusher And M Sand Through Its            ...Petitioners
               Proprietor And Others
                         Versus
               Grampanchayat Nool Through Its Sarpanch And               ...Respondents
               Another

                                             ——————
               Mr. Aditya Raktade, for the Applicants/Intervenor.
               Mr. Manoj Patil a/w Mr. Siddhesh Kadam for the Respondents/Original
               Petitioner.
               Mr. Sudhir N. Patil h/f Mr. Sumit S. Vhanbatte for Respondent No.1.
               Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                               ——————
                                                CORAM :       SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
                                                              NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

                                                DATE       : AUGUST 25, 2026.

               P. C. :

               1.        Considering the order which we propose to pass in Writ Petition,

               the intervention application is allowed.




                [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]                       [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]



               Jamadar-SL                         1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.