Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANGITA SURESH BODARE AND ORS.versusSANJAY RAMCHANDRA JADHAV AND ORS.

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The delay is condoned and the first appeal is restored to its original position.

Summary

The applicants filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in restoring a first appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned despite procedural lapses. It held that the reasons provided justified condoning the delay. Consequently, the court ordered that the first appeal be restored to its original position. The court also directed the appellant to remove the outstanding office objections. No further orders were made beyond these directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in restoring the first appeal can be condoned
  • Whether the first appeal can be reinstated despite prior dismissal for non‑removal of office objections

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • restoration of appeal
  • office objections
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • interim application

Judgment

                                                                                          31-IA-11126-2025=.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11126 OF 2025
          Digitally
                                                                 IN
          signed by
          UDAY                                  FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 23342 OF 2019
UDAY      SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI   JAGTAP
JAGTAP    Date:
          2026.08.27
          18:38:43
                       Sangita Suresh Bodare and Ors.                               … Applicants
          +0530

                                        Vs.
                       Sanjay Ramchandra Jadhav and Ors.                            … Respondents
                                                      ………….
                       Mr. Amol S. Deshinge i/b Santosh D. Bhosale for the Applicants
                                                      ………….
                                                            CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                                            DATE       : 25th AUGUST, 2026.
                       P. C. :

                       I.A. NO. 11126 OF 2025

                       .         The applicant seeks to condone the delay in restoration of the First

                       Appeal which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections.

                       2.        For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stand

                       condoned.

                       3.        The First Appeal is restored to its original position.

                       4.        Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to remove the office

                       objections.




                       Uday S. Jagtap                         1 of 2
                                                              31-IA-11126-2025=.doc



FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 23342 OF 2019


5.       Admit.

6.       Call for record and proceedings.

7.       Print is dispensed with.

8.       The parties shall be at liberty to file reply, rejoinder or compilation

of documents.

9.       The appellant shall remove the office objections.



                                               ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )




Uday S. Jagtap                       2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.