Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANJALI SAGAR KALANIversusSAGAR KISANCHAND KALANI

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the interim application and granted condonation of the 27‑day delay.

Summary

The applicant filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 27‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal. The court heard counsel for the respondent and examined the application. Finding merit, the bench allowed the interim application, granting the condonation. The appeal (ST No. 24335 of 2025) was scheduled for hearing on 7 September 2026 and both parties were directed to be present. No substantive merits of the underlying family dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 27 days in filing a Family Court appeal can be condoned under procedural law

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • family court appeal
  • interim application
  • procedural law
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                        25-IA-11197-2025 (C) (copy).doc




             IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11197 OF 2025
                                  IN
               FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST NO. 24234 OF 2025

Anjali Sagar Kalani                                     ..........Applicant
      VERSUS
Sagar Kisanchand Kalani                                .........Respondent

                                         ...
None for the Applicant.
Mr. Pratik G. Tare, Advocate for Respondent.
                                    ...

                                   CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                           ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                   DATE : 29 AUGUST 2026.
P. C. :

1.        The present Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of

27 days in filing the Family Court Appeal.

2.        We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent

and have gone through the contents of the Interim Application. We are

satisfied that the Interim Application deserves to be allowed.

3.        Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

4.         The Family Court Appeal (ST) No.24335 of 2025 be listed 7th

September 2026 under the caption “for direction”.



Suresh                               1
                                                        25-IA-11197-2025 (C) (copy).doc




5.       Both the parties are directed to remain present on the next date of

hearing.


         (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                   (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




Suresh                              2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.