Bombay High Court
SHRI. SUNIL AMRUTA BOBADE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petitions are dismissed for non‑prosecution and the interim application is disposed.
Summary
Petitioners Shri Sunil Gokul Rane and Shri Sunil Amruta Bobade filed writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief. Their counsel, Mr. Laxman Deshmukh, filed vakalatnamas and indicated no objection to the petition. The petitions were listed for dismissal, and the court noted that counsel was aware of the pendency. Since the petitioners failed to prosecute the writ petitions, the court dismissed them for non‑prosecution. The related interim application was also held not to survive for consideration and was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petitions should be dismissed for non‑prosecution
- Whether the interim application should be entertained
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- interim application
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-KOL:9630-DB
3-WP-7995-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7995 OF 2021
Shri. Sunil Gokul Rane ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 6470 OF 2021
Shri. Sunil Amruta Bobade ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11214 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6470 OF 2021
Shri. Sunil Amruta Bobade ...Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Laxman Deshmukh, for the Petitioners.
Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No. 7995/2021.
Mr. V.M.Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No. 6470/2021.
——————
Coram : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Date : OCTOBER 06, 2026
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has already
Arya Chavan 1 of 2
3-WP-7995-2021.doc
given his no objection to the Petitioner and Advocate Rajaram
Deshmukh has filed his vakalatnama.
2. The Petition is listed under the caption for dismissal. The order
indicates that Advocate Rajaram Deshmukh had appeared on the last
occasion, and is therefore aware of the pendency of the Petition.
3. The Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Interim Application does not survive for consideration and stands
disposed of.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Arya Chavan 2 of 2
Checking your session…