Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DR MANISHA BHARAT SALUNKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Both interim applications were allowed as prayed.

Summary

Dr. Manisha Bharat Salunkhe filed a writ petition (No. 25 of 2024) and a contempt petition (No. 4 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court, seeking interim relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The applicant filed Interim Application No. 11265 of 2025 in the writ petition and Interim Application No. 11103 of 2025 in the contempt petition. Both applications were heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Justice Ajit B. Kadetankar. After considering the arguments of counsel, the Court found that the relief sought in the prayer clause (b) of each application was justified. Consequently, the Court allowed both interim applications and disposed of them accordingly.

Issues considered

  • Whether the interim relief sought in Interim Application No. 11265 of 2025 (writ petition) should be granted
  • Whether the interim relief sought in Interim Application No. 11103 of 2025 (contempt petition) should be granted

Subjects

  • interim relief
  • writ petition
  • contempt petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                      26-IA-11265-2025.doc


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11265 OF 2025
                                                        IN
                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 25 OF 2024


                      Dr. Manisha Bharat Salunkhe                                   … Applicant

                                                 Versus

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                               … Respondent


                                                       WITH
                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11103 OF 2025
                                                        IN
                                          CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2024


                      Dr. Manisha Bharat Salunkhe                                   … Applicant

                                                 Versus

                      Mahesh J Chothe & Anr.                                        … Respondents


                                                       ——————
                      Adv. S. R. Vasekar i/by Adv. S. A. Rajeshirke for the Applicants.

                      Mr. A. P. Vanarase, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
                                                         ——————

                                                          Coram :      NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
TALLE                                                                  AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Digitally signed by
                                                          Date     :   17th January 2026.
TALLE SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Date: 2026.01.17
16:18:40 +0530




                      Shubham                             1 of 2
                                                             26-IA-11265-2025.doc




PER COURT :

1.        Heard.

2.        For the reasons stated in the applications, both the applications are

allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

3.        Both the Interim Applications stand disposed of.



     [ AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ]               [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ]




Shubham                              2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.