Bombay High Court
BABAN VYANKU GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal.
Summary
The applicant, Baban Vyanku Gaikwad, sought regular bail which was rejected by the Sessions Court. He filed an appeal against that order but failed to do so within the prescribed time limit. The applicant then moved an interim application seeking condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. The Court, after considering the reasons provided in the application, decided to condone the delay. Consequently, the interim application was disposed and the appeal was listed for hearing on 9 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the appeal against the bail rejection order can be condoned
Subjects
- bail
- condonation of delay
- criminal appeal
- interim application
Judgment
1 32-IA 1140-26.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1140 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.7263 OF 2026
Baban Vyanku Gaikwad … Applicant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
-----
Mr. Sumit Khaire for the Applicant.
Mr. Y. Y. Dabake, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Tanmay Kate, appointed advocate for Respondent No.2.
-----
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
Digitally
signed by
MUGDHA
DATE : 03RD SEPTEMBER 2026
MUGDHA MANOJ
MANOJ PARANJAPE
PARANJAPE Date:
P.C. :
2026.09.03
18:04:30
+0530
1. This is an Application for condonation of delay in filing Appeal
against the order passed by the Sessions Court/Special Court rejecting the
application filed by the present Appellant for regular bail.
2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay in filing the
Appeal is condoned.
3. The Interim Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
4. List the Criminal Appeal on 09th September 2026.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Mugdha 1 of 1
Checking your session…