Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Mahendra Ramdas PatilversusState Of Maharashtra through its Secretary for Education

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The amendment is permitted, and the petitioner may file the amended petition within one week.

Summary

Mahendra Ramdas Patil filed a writ petition (No. 6874 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra, seeking a schedule of amendment to his petition. The petitioner, through counsel Avinash Fatangare and others, applied for permission to amend the petition. The court examined the application and found no impediment to allowing the amendment. Accordingly, the judges permitted the petitioner to file the amended petition within one week and directed service of the amended copy on all parties. The court also ordered the respondent to file a reply affidavit, if any, within ten days of the amendment. The interim application was disposed of without any costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner should be permitted to amend the writ petition in terms of the schedule of amendment

Subjects

  • interim application
  • amendment
  • civil procedure
  • writ petition
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                                   4_IA_11565_2025.DOC


                       Prasad
                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                               INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11565 OF 2025
                                                               IN
                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 6874 OF 2025
                                Mahendra Ramdas Patil                                   …...Applicant/Petitioner
                                       VERSUS
                                State Of Maharashtra
                                through its Secretary for Education                     …...Respondent
                                                                      _________
                                Mr. Avinash Fatangare a/w Archana Shelar i/by Vishakha Pandit, for the
                                     Applicant / Petitioner.
                                Mr. Vikas M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent – State.
                                Mr. Sachin D. Kadam, for the Respondent No.5.
                                                                 _________

                                                                   CORAM:         G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                                  DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                                                                   DATE:          24 AUGUST 2026.

                                P.C.

                                1.     The present interim application is filed praying for amendment in terms of
                                schedule of amendment.

                                2.     Having perused the averments made in the application, we are of the
                                opinion that the amendment needs to be permitted. Accordingly, the Interim
                                Application is allowed by permitting the Petitioner to amend the petition in terms
                                of the schedule of amendments. Let the amendment be carried out within a
                                period of one week from today. Amended copy of the petition be served on all the
                                parties.

                                3.     Reply affidavit to the amended petition, if any, be placed on record on
                                behalf of the Respondent within ten days from today. A copy of the same to be
                                served prior to the adjourned date of hearing on the advocate for the Petitioner.

                                4.     Interim Application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs.


                                (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                 (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

PRASAD
RAJENDRASING
RAJPUT                                                            Page 1 of 1
 Digitally signed by
 PRASAD
 RAJENDRASING
 RAJPUT
 Date: 2026.08.24
 15:56:27 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.