Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

D. G. B. DAYANAND LAW COLLEGE, SOLAPUR THR. PRINCIPAL DR. SONALI J. GAIKWADversusDR. UPPULURI MANGAPATTI RAO THE PRINCIPAL D. G. B. DAYANANAND LAW COLLEGE, SOLAPUR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court held that the intervenor may file a review or recall application against the order dated 10 August 2026.

Summary

The D.G.B. Dayanand Law College, as intervenor, challenged the order dated 10 August 2026 that disposed of Writ Petition No. 3954 of 2022. The court considered whether the intervenor could seek a review or recall of that order. It held that the intervenor is entitled to file a review or recall application against the order. Consequently, the interim application filed by the intervenor was disposed of without further order. The judgment thus allows the intervenor to pursue a separate review application.

Issues considered

  • Whether an intervenor aggrieved by a disposal order of a writ petition may file an application for review or recall of that order

Subjects

  • interim application
  • review
  • recall
  • writ petition
  • intervenor
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                            31-IA-1193-2026.doc


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1193 OF 2026
                                                          IN
                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 3954 OF 2022

                        D. G. B. Dayanand Law College, Solapur ...Applicant.
                        In the Matter in Between :
                        Dr. Uppuluri Mangapatti Rao,
                        The Principal of D. G. B. Dayananand
                        Law College, Solapur                   ...Petitioner.
                                 Versus
                        The State of Maharashtra & Ors.        ...Respondents.
                                                       ——————
                        Mr. Mohansinh U. Rajput for the Applicant.
                        Mr.Shivraj Jagadale, i/b. Mr. Vijay Killedar, for the Petitioner.
                        Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondents-State.
                                                           ——————
                                                              Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                          Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                              Date      : August 25, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        By the order dated 10th August 2026, the Writ Petition is already

                        disposed of.

                        2.        In event, the Intervenor is aggrieved by the order dated 10 th

                        August 2026, it is open for the Intervenor to take out an application

                        seeking review/recall of the order dated 10th August 2026.

                        3.        The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                             [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.08.25
           22:23:32
           +0530
                        Gaikwad RD                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.