Bombay High Court
Uday Ghanshyam NaikversusChandan Shanti Group of Companies
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court held that the 22‑day delay in filing the second appeal may be condoned as the justification pleaded was satisfactory.
Summary
The applicant, Uday Ghanshyam Naik, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 22‑day delay in filing a second appeal under Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The respondent, Chandan Shanti Group of Companies, opposed the application. The court examined the length of the delay and the justification pleaded by the applicant. Finding the justification satisfactory and the delay not excessive, the judge decided to condone the delay. Consequently, the interim application was allowed and the matter was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 22 days in filing a second appeal can be condoned under the procedural law
- Whether the justification pleaded by the applicant is sufficient to merit condonation of delay
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- second appeal
- civil procedure
- interim application
Judgment
Neeta Sawant 3-IA-12165-2025.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12165 OF 2025
(FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY)
IN
SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 30769 OF 2025
Uday Ghanshyam Naik …..Applicant
: Versus :
Chandan Shanti Group of Companies ….Respondent
__________________________________________________________________
Mr. Vineet B. Naik, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. R.D. Suryawanshi i/b. Mr. Suraj
N. Naik, for the Applicant.
Mr. Ashutosh R. Gole with Mr. Siddharth Wakankar for Respondent No.1-
Plaintiff.
__________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : 25 AUGUST 2026.
P.C. :
1) The Interim Application is filed for condonation of delay of 22
days in filing the Second Appeal. The Application is opposed by Mr. Gole,
the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-Plaintiff.
2) Considering the length of delay and the justification pleaded, I
deem it appropriate to condone the delay in filing the Appeal. The Interim
Application is accordingly allowed by condoning the delay in filing the
Digitally
signed by
NEETA
Appeal. The Interim Application is disposed of.
NEETA SHAILESH
SHAILESH SAWANT
SAWANT Date:
2026.08.28
16:24:15
+0530 SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
___________________________________________________________________________
__________PAGE NO. 1 of 1_________
Tuesday, 25 August 2026
Checking your session…