Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEEPALI KIRAN PAWARversusKIRAN RAGHUNATH PAWAR

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court held that the ad‑interim relief shall continue until the disposal of Family Court Appeal No. 1 of 2026.

Summary

The applicant, Deepali Kiran Pawar, filed Interim Application No. 122 of 2026 seeking continuation of ad‑interim relief previously granted on 13 February 2026. The relief pertained to prayer clause (b) and was to remain in effect until the disposal of Family Court Appeal No. 1 of 2026. On the date of hearing, the respondent, Kiran Raghunath Pawar, failed to appear before the Court. The Court noted the respondent's absence and, relying on the earlier order, directed that the ad‑interim relief continue until the family court appeal is finally disposed of. Consequently, the interim application was marked as disposed. The judgment contains no discussion of substantive legal issues beyond procedural continuation of interim relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether the ad‑interim relief granted on 13 February 2026 should continue in the absence of the respondent’s appearance

Subjects

  • interim relief
  • family court appeal
  • procedural law
  • civil procedure
  • non‑appearance of respondent

Judgment

                                                                  22-IA-122-26.doc


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 122 OF 2026

        Deepali Kiran Pawar                             … Applicant
              V/s.
        Kiran Raghunath Pawar                           … Respondent
                                   ___________
        Adv. Avesh Ghadge a/w Aditya Ghadge, for the applicant.
        None for the respondent.
                                  ___________
                                      CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL,
                                                & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                      DATE : 25 AUGUST 2026
        P. C. :


        1.      In interim application no. 122 of 2026, by an order dated

        13 February 2026, ad-interim relief was granted in terms of prayer

        clause (b).


        2.    Today, none appears on behalf of the respondent when the

        matter is called out. Hence, the ad-interim relief granted earlier to

        continue till the disposal of Family Court Appeal No. 1 of 2026.


        3.    In view of the above, the interim application stands disposed of.




        [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.]                  [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]




Rushi                                      1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.