Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUDHIR SITARAM KEMSE AND ORSversusKESHAV MARUTI SALUNKHE AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Notice must be issued to the legal representatives of the deceased respondent, and the applicants may serve them privately and file an affidavit of service.

Summary

The applicants filed an interim application in a writ petition after respondent No.4 died before the petition was instituted. The court noted the death and directed that notice be issued to the proposed legal representatives of the deceased respondent, designated as respondents 4(a) to 4(c). The notice is to be returnable on 19 October 2026. Additionally, the court permitted the applicants to serve the legal representatives by private service and to file an affidavit of service. No substantive merits of the writ were addressed; the order dealt solely with procedural service of notice. The application was therefore disposed with directions for service.

Issues considered

  • Whether notice must be issued to the legal representatives of a deceased respondent in an interim application
  • Whether the applicants may serve the legal representatives by private service and file an affidavit of service

Subjects

  • service of notice
  • legal representatives
  • deceased respondent
  • interim application
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                         6-IA12675-2025.DOC

                                                                                    Santosh

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12675 OF 2025
                                                  IN
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 697 OF 2025

                      Sudhir Sitaram Kemse and Ors.                          ...Applicants
                                       Versus
                      Keshav Maruti Salunkhe and Ors.                     …Respondents
SANTOSH
SUBHASH               Mr. Indrajeet Jagdale,i/b Mr. Abhishek R. Avachat, for the
KULKARNI
Digitally signed by
                            Applicants.
SANTOSH SUBHASH
KULKARNI
Date: 2026.09.22
                      Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
11:29:55 +0530
                      Ms. Aloka Nadkarni, AGP for the State.

                                                     CORAM:     N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                                     DATED:     21st SEPTEMBER, 2026

                      PC:-

                      1.     Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants.

                      2.     It appears that respondent No.4 has passed away before

                      the petition came to be instituted.

                      3.     Issue notice to respondent Nos. 4(a) to 4(c) to the

                      application – the proposed legal representatives of respondent

                      No.4, returnable on 19th October, 2026.

                      4.     In addition to notice through Court, the applicants are at

                      liberty to serve the proposed legal representatives of respondent

                      No.4 by private service and file an affidavit of service.

                                                                  [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

                                                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.