Bombay High Court
Sambhaji Gopalrao Mane DECEASEDversusSuresh Vardhanna Rai
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The delay in filing the second appeal is condoned subject to the applicants paying costs of Rs.1,00,000 to the respondent.
Summary
The applicants filed an interim application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of a delay of three years and 320 days in filing a second appeal against a 2022 judgment. They explained the delay was due to the illness and subsequent death of a key applicant. The respondent’s counsel argued the reasons were unconvincing but suggested condonation with exemplary costs. The court, noting that the prejudice to the applicants if the delay were not condoned outweighed any prejudice to the respondent, ordered condonation of the delay subject to the applicants paying Rs.1,00,000 to the respondent. The court directed that upon payment and acknowledgment, the second appeal would be registered.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of three years and 320 days in filing a second appeal can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
- Whether exemplary costs should be imposed on the applicants for the delay.
Legislation cited
- Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5
Subjects
- Limitation
- Condonation of delay
- Second appeal
- Costs
- Section 5 Limitation Act
Judgment
30 - IA - 1283 - 2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VAIBHAV
RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Date: 2026.09.03
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1283 OF 2026
20:07:10 +0530
IN
SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 7555 OF 2026
Sambhaji Gopalrao Mane
Since Deceased His Legal Heirs & Ors. … Applicants
V/s.
Suresh Vardhanna Rai … Respondent
Mr. Amit Sale i/by Mr. Ajit Kenjale (through V.C.) for the
Applicants.
Mr. Praveen H. Deshpande for the Respondent.
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 3, 2026
P.C.:
1. By the present Interim Application filed under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act, 1963, the Applicants are seeking condonation of delay of
3 years and 320 days caused in filing the Second Appeal against the
judgment and decree dated 27th September 2022 passed by the learned
Ad-Hoc District Judge-I, Sangli, whereby Regular Civil Appeal No. 298
of 2015 filed by the Respondent was allowed.
2. The Applicants have given the reasons for the delay in paragraphs
4 to 13 of the Application.
3. Mr. Amit Sale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, submits that
VRJ 1
30 - IA - 1283 - 2026.docx
the Applicants had no intention to delay the filing of the Appeal. He
submits that the delay in filing the Appeal is bona fide.
4. Mr. Praveen H. Deshpande, learned Advocate for the Respondent,
though submits that the reasons sought to be put forth by the
Applicants are not convincing, however, in view of the statements made
by the Applicants in the Application that the delay in filing the Appeal
was on account of the ailment of Applicant No. 1(b)-Sangram
Sambhajirao Mane, who subsequently passed away on 31st March
2023, Mr. Praveen H. Deshpande, learned Advocate for the Respondent,
on instructions from the Respondent, in all fairness, submits that the
delay be condoned, subject to imposition of exemplary costs, which he
quantifies at Rs.2,00,000/-.
5. Perused the Application and the statements made.
6. Though, as submitted by Mr. Praveen H. Deshpande, learned
Advocate for the Respondent, the reasons put forth are not convincing,
however, in the interest of justice, the prejudice that would be caused to
the Applicants if the delay is not condoned would be far greater than
the prejudice that may be caused to the Respondent if the delay is
condoned. At any rate, the subject matter of the present proceedings
pertains to commercial transactions and, as such, the prejudice, if any,
caused to the Respondent can be compensated in terms of money.
VRJ 2
30 - IA - 1283 - 2026.docx
7. Mr. Amit Sale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on
instructions from the Applicants, states that the Applicants shall pay
costs of Rs.1,00,000/- to the Respondent.
8. In view of the above, the delay of three years and 320 days
caused in filing the Second Appeal is condoned, subject to the
Applicants paying costs of Rs.1,00,000/- to the sole Respondent.
9. Mr. Amit Sale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on
instructions from the Applicants, states that the costs of Rs.1,00,000/-
shall be paid to the sole Respondent within one week from today.
10. Interim Application No. 1283 of 2026 is, therefore, allowed in the
aforesaid terms.
11. If the Applicants pay the costs of Rs.1,00,000/- within the
aforesaid time limit and produce the acknowledgment of payment from
the sole Respondent before the Registry of this Court, the Registry shall
register the Second Appeal.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
VRJ 3
Checking your session…