Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANNAPPA LINGAPPA KARAJANGEversusJAYASHREE MAHADEV KARAJANGE AND ORS.

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court held that the interim relief sought under prayer clauses (a) and (b) was justified and ordered the removal of office objections.

Summary

An interim application was filed by the applicant, Uday S. Jagtap, in First Appeal No. 1702 of 2024 against the respondents, Jayashree Mahadev Karajange and others. The matter was listed before the Circuit Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Kolhapur, and was heard on 2 September 2026. The applicant was represented by Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, Ajinkya Walvekar, and Atul M. Khilari. After considering the arguments and the prayer clauses (a) and (b) sought in the application, the court allowed the interim relief. The order directed the applicant to remove the office objections.

Subjects

  • interim relief
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • office objections

Judgment

                                                                                       36-IA-1298-2026=.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1298 OF 2026
                                                               IN
          Digitally

UDAY
          signed by
          UDAY                                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1702 OF 2024
          SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI   JAGTAP
          Date:
JAGTAP    2026.09.04   Annappa Lingappa Karajange                                    … Applicant
          12:50:08
          +0530

                                        Vs.
                       Jayashree Mahadev Karajange And Ors.                          … Respondents
                                                    ………….
                       Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan a/w Ajinkya Walvekar, Atul M. Khilari for the
                       Applicant
                                                    ………….
                                                           CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                                                           DATE       : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P. C. :

                       .         Heard.

                       2.        For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in

                       terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

                       3.        The applicant shall remove the office objections.




                                                                       ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )




                       Uday S. Jagtap                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.