Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusZAGA RUPSING CHAURE -DECEASED THR. LRS. 1.1 JIJABAI RAMU BARADE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The First Appeal is dismissed because the enhanced compensation is less than Rs.2 lakh.

Summary

The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against a judgment and award dated 19 July 2014 concerning land acquisition compensation. The reference court had enhanced the compensation to Rs. 1,95,740, which was slightly more than three times the original amount of Rs. 65,052 awarded by the SLAO. The appellate court observed that the enhanced amount was less than Rs.2 lakh and held that such a limited quantum does not warrant interference with the lower court's decision. Consequently, the First Appeal was dismissed without examining the merits of the compensation claim. All pending interlocutory applications were also disposed of as a result of the dismissal.

Issues considered

  • Whether a First Appeal can be dismissed solely on the ground that the enhanced compensation is less than Rs.2 lakh
  • Whether the appellate court must examine the merits of the compensation award when the quantum is minimal

Subjects

  • Land Acquisition
  • Compensation
  • Appeal
  • Quantum
  • Judicial Review

Judgment

                                                                               20-FA(ST)-17060-2019F.doc



                                                                                              Sayali



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally signed
SAYALI
DEEPAK
          by SAYALI
          DEEPAK
          UPASANI
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
          Date:
UPASANI   2026.08.25
          16:38:56 +0530


                                         FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17060 OF 2019


                             The State Of Maharashtra
                             (Through The Special Land
                             Acquisition Officer) And Anr.                   … Appellants
                                         V/s.
                             Shri. Zaga Rupsing Chaure
                             (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Jijabai
                             Ramu Barde And Ors.                             … Respondents

                                                           WITH
                                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2021
                                                           WITH
                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13356 OF 2025
                                                           WITH
                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13357 OF 2025
                                                       WITH
                                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2021


                             Mr. A. R. Patil. Additional GP for Appellant.


                                                         CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                         DATED      : AUGUST 25, 2026




                                                              1
                                                  20-FA(ST)-17060-2019F.doc


P.C.:


            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13357 OF 2025
1.      For the reasons stated in paragraph nos. 2to 5, delay in
filing Appeal is condoned.

2.      Application is allowed and disposed of.

               INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13356 OF 2025

3.      For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed
and disposed of.

4.      Application is allowed and disposed of.

              FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17060 OF 2019

5.      The present First Appeal arises from the judgment and
Award dated 19th July, 2014 passed by the learned 3rd Joint Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Nashik in L.A.R. No. 213 of 2008. On
consideration of the enhanced compensation awarded by the
Reference Court, it is noticed that the amount of enhancement is
less than Rs.2 lakh. Having regard to the quantum involved in
matters involving such limited enhancement, I am of the view
that no interference with the impugned judgment and Award is
warranted in the present appeal.

6.      The amount granted by the SLAO is Rs. 65,052/-. The
enhancement granted is Rs. 1,95,740/-, which is slightly more
than three times the amount granted by the SLAO.




                                  2
                                              20-FA(ST)-17060-2019F.doc


7.    In view of the aforesaid circumstance, the First Appeal is
dismissed.

8.    It is clarified that this Court has not examined or
adjudicated upon the merits of the claims or the correctness of
the findings recorded by the Reference Court. The dismissal of
the First Appeal is confined to the ground that the amount of
enhanced compensation involved is less than Rs.2 lakh.

9.    The dismissal shall, therefore, not be construed as an
adjudication on the merits of the judgment and Award under
challenge.

10.   In view of the disposal of the First Appeal, all pending
interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive and are
accordingly disposed of.


                                         (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                               3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.