Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SINDHU ANANT DALVIversusANANT SADASHIV DALVI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court condoned the 100‑day delay in filing the revision and ordered its registration.

Summary

The applicant, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 100‑day delay in filing a revision application against respondents Anant Sadashiv Dalvi and others. The respondent No.1 was served but did not appear. The court considered the applicant’s counsel’s submissions and, without reference to any statutory provision or precedent, allowed the interim application. It condoned the delay, ordered the revision application to be registered, and set a board date for 10 September 2026. The order was pronounced by Justice Shivkumar Dige of the Bombay High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a 100‑day delay in filing a revision application can be condoned.

Subjects

  • revision
  • condonation of delay
  • interim application
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                              41-IA-1341-2025 (CR).doc

                   Tikam

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1341 OF 2025
                                                         IN
                                                 REVNST/7389/2025
VAISHALI
ANIL                   Sindhu Anant Dalvi                                        ...Applicant/s
TIKAM                  Versus
                       Anant Sadashiv Dalvi and Anr.                             ...Respondent/s
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
2026.08.25
                       _________________________________________________________________
10:59:12 +0530

                       Ms. Sheetal M. Ubale i/by Mr. Rajaram V. Bansode, Advocate for
                       Applicant.
                       Mr. S.M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent No.2-State.
                       _________________________________________________________________

                                                             CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                             DATE        :   21st AUGUST, 2026.
                       P.C. :

                       1.           Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for

                       the State.

                       2.           Though Respondent No.1 is served, none appears for him.

                       3.           By this application, Applicant is seeking condonation of 100

                       days delay in filing the revision application.

                       4.           Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

                       Applicant, I pass following order:

                                                            ORDER

                       (i)          Interim Application is allowed.

                       (ii)         100 days' delay in filing the Revision Application is condoned.


                                                         Page 1 of 2
                                                      41-IA-1341-2025 (CR).doc

Tikam

    (iii)   Revision Application be registered.

    (iv)    Place Revision Application on Board on 10/09/2026.



                                               (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                 Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.