Bombay High Court
MAHAVIR BHUJGONDA PATILversusTATYASO SHANTGONDA PATIL AND ORS
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court held that the fifteen‑day delay in filing the Second Appeal is condoned.
Summary
Mahavir Bhujgonda Patil filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 15‑day delay in filing Second Appeal (ST) No. 32792 of 2022 against a judgment dated 11 August 2022 passed by the District Judge‑1, Sangli. The applicant alleged financial hardship and that he could obtain legal assistance only after approaching the Court’s Legal Aid Cell. The respondents’ counsel did not oppose the condonation. The Court, after considering the applicant’s circumstances and the lack of opposition, allowed the application and ordered that the delay be condoned. Consequently, the Registry was directed to register the second appeal. The interim application was therefore allowed and disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of fifteen days in filing a Second Appeal (ST) under the Civil Procedure Code can be condoned in view of the applicant’s financial hardship and lack of opposition.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- second appeal
- legal aid
- civil procedure
- interim application
Judgment
22-IA-1372-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1372 OF 2023
IN
SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 32792 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1373 OF 2023
IN
SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 32792 OF 2022
Mahavir Bhujgonda Patil ...Applicant
Versus
Tatyaso Shantgonda Patil And Ors. ...Respondents
__________________________________________________________
Mr. D. G. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Om Gurav i/b Sandeep Korgave, Advocate for the Respondent
No. 18 to 20.
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 4th September, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr. D. G. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant
and Mr. Om Gurav, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 18
to 20.
2. By this Interim Application, the Applicant seeks
condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the Second Appeal (ST)
No. 32792 of 2022, against the Judgment and Decree dated
Arjun 1
22-IA-1372-2023.doc
11.08.2022, passed by the District Judge-1, Sangli in Regular Civil
Appeal No. 353 of 2016.
3. Mr. D. G. Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states
that the Applicant is in financial crisis and as such, was not in a
position to avail legal assistance. He submits that the Applicant
finally approached the Legal Aid Cell of this Court to provide him
with legal assistance.
4. Mr. Om Gurav, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos.
18 to 20, does not oppose the condonation of delay of 15 days in
filing of Regular Civil Appeal No. 353 of 2016.
5. In view of the above, considering the statements made in
the Application, more so in paragraph Nos. 7 and 8 and the fair
stand taken by Mr. Om Gurav, learned Advocate for the
Respondent Nos. 18 to 20, this Application is allowed.
Consequently, the delay in filing of the Second Appeal (ST) No.
32792 of 2022 is condoned.
6. The Registry is directed to register the Second Appeal (ST)
No. 32792 of 2022.
Arjun 2
22-IA-1372-2023.doc
7. Interim Application No. 1372 of 2023 is allowed and
disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date:
2026.09.05
11:05:16
+0530
Arjun 3
Checking your session…