Bombay High Court
TEHMEENA NAVED KHANversusNAVED NASIR KHAN AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The application for condonation of delay is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Tehmeena Naved Khan, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 49‑day delay in filing a criminal revision application challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad dated 20 July 2019. No counsel appeared for the applicant when the matter was listed. The High Court had earlier issued notice to the respondents on 13 March 2020, but the notice could not be served because the spare copy was not supplied. Neither the applicant nor his counsel complied with the Court's directions, and the revision application remained pending. Consequently, Justice Ashish S. Chavan dismissed the delay‑condonation application on the ground of non‑prosecution, thereby rejecting the applicant's request.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court should condone a 49‑day delay in filing the revision application.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- revision application
- non‑prosecution
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- notice service
Judgment
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA
JOHNSON GONSALVES
JOHNSON Date: 2026.08.24 12:58:21
GONSALVES +0530
sg 6.ia1409-19.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Interim Application No. 1409 Of 2019
In
Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No. 640 Of 2019
Tehmeena Naved Khan … Applicant
versus
Naved Nasir Khan And Ors. … Respondents
----
None for the Applicant.
Ms. Sangeeta Shinde, APP, for the Respondent/ State.
----
Coram: Ashish S. Chavan, J.
Date: 21st August, 2026.
P.C.:
1. None appears for the Revision Applicant when called.
2. This is an application filed on behalf of the Applicant seeking to
condone the delay of 49 days in filing the accompanying revision
application. The revision application seeks to assail the order of the
Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, dated 20 th July, 2019.
3. Record indicates that this Court had issued notice to the
Respondents on 13th March, 2020. However, notice was not issued
Page 1 of 2
__________________________________________________
21st August, 2026
sg 6.ia1409-19.docx
since the spare copy was not supplied. Till date, the position remains
the same. Evidently, neither the Applicant nor his Counsel has taken
any steps to comply with the directions of this Court. Resultantly, the
revision application along with the accompanying delay condonation
application, is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Ashish S. Chavan, J.)
Page 2 of 2
__________________________________________________
21st August, 2026
Checking your session…