Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KUMAR LAXMANRAO SHINDEversusSMT. RADHABAI VITHAL WAIKAR DECEASED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI PRAKASH ANANT VALAME

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court condoned the delay and allowed the society to be impleaded as respondent.

Summary

The applicant filed an interim application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record after a delay of 19 years and 4 months. The cooperative housing society, which had acquired the suit property, sought to be impleaded as respondent. The court examined whether such a long delay could be condoned and whether the society could be added as a party. It held that the delay, though substantial, could be condoned to allow the appeal to be heard on its merits. Consequently, the legal heirs of the deceased were permitted to be brought on record and the society was directed to be impleaded as Respondent No. 2. The appeal was then listed for a final hearing on 18 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 19 years and 4 months in filing an application to bring legal representatives of a deceased party can be condoned.
  • Whether a cooperative housing society that has acquired the suit property can be impleaded as a respondent in the appeal.

Subjects

  • interim application
  • condonation of delay
  • impleadment
  • legal representatives of deceased
  • cooperative housing society
  • second appeal
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AS:35617

              Renuka                                           2-IA-142-2026.docx


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2026
                                               WITH
                           INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) No.23761of 2026
                                                  IN
                                SECOND APPEAL NO. 529 OF 1999
                                               WITH
                                SECOND APPEAL NO. 529 OF 1999
              Kumar Laxmanrao Shinde                            ...Applicant
                               V/s.

              Smt. Radhabai Vithal Waikar Deceased             ...Respondent
              Power of Attorney Holder Shri Prakash
              Anant Valame
                                            ________________
              Mr. Ranjit Dilip Shinde, for Applicant.
              Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar for Respondent.
              Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh (through VC) for Intervenor in IAST 2376/2026
                                            ________________
                                                    CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                     DATED: 29 AUGUST 2026.
              P.C.:
              1)          Interim Application No. 142 of 2026 is filed for bringing on
              record legal representatives of the deceased Respondent. There is delay
              of 19 years and 4 months in filing the Application. However, it appears
              that the original Respondent has transferred the suit property in favour
              of Ashwini Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Accordingly, the society
              has filed Interim Application No. 142 of 2026 seeking intervention in the
              Appeal. Respondent No. 2 may now remain a mere formal party and the
              intervener society would be the main contesting party. It appears that

                                              Page No.1 of 2
                                             29 August 2026
                          Renuka                                             2-IA-142-2026.docx


                          now the Appeal would mainly be defended by the society. In that view of
                          the matter, though there is substantial delay in applying for bringing on
                          record legal representative of the deceased Respondent, Interim
                          Application No. 142 of 2026 can be allowed so that the Appeal can be
                          heard on merits and the lis between the parties can be decided by
                          hearing Appellants as well as the intervenor society. For that purpose,
                          Intervention Application by the society also needs to be allowed.


                          2)          Accordingly, the delay in filing Interim Application No. 142
                          of 2026 is condoned and the Application is allowed by permitting legal
                          heirs of deceased Respondent No. 2 to be brought on record.
                          Amendments to be carried out forthwith.


                          3)          Interim Application is disposed of .


                          INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) No.23761 of 2026:-
                          4)          Interim Application is filed by the society is also allowed and
                          the society is directed to be impleaded as Respondent No. 2 in the
                          Appeal. Amendments to be carried out forthwith.

                          5)          Interim Application is disposed of.


                          SECOND APPEAL NO. 529 OF 1999:-
                          6)          List the Second Appeal ‘for final hearing’ on 18 September
                          2026. Appellant to supply papers in the Appeal including the paper book
                          to be served on Mr. Deshmukh.
                                                                             [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]


Signed by: Renuka S Thakur
                                                           Page No.2 of 2
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge                       29 August 2026
Date: 01/09/2026 10:26:01


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.