Bombay High Court
MR. GAJENDRA NARAYAN WAIPHALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AND ANR
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court held that the writ petition may be restored as the applicant made out a sufficient case for restoration.
Summary
The applicant, Mr. Gajendra Narayan Waiphalkar, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his writ petition (No. 12770 of 2019) which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 15 April 2026. The petition had been dismissed because the applicant failed to pursue the proceedings. Counsel for both parties were heard, and the court examined the contents of the interim application. The judges were satisfied that a sufficient case was made to justify restoring the dismissed petition. Consequently, the court allowed the interim application, thereby reinstating the writ petition for further consideration.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition dismissed for default can be restored on an interim application
- Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause to merit restoration of the petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- restoration
- non‑prosecution
- interim application
- high court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
15-IA-1451-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1451 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 12770 OF 2019
Mr. Gajendra Narayan Waiphalkar …Applicant
Vs
The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary,
Revenue Department, and Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Kirankumar Phakade a/w Ms. Shweta K. Phakade Advocate for
Applicant
Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl GP a/w Mr. Santosh A. Jadhav, AGP for
the State
Mr. Rajesh Datar (VC), advocate for Respondent No.2
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 21 SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C. :
1. This application is filed for restoration of the Writ Petition
which was dismissed for non-prosecution by order dated 15 April
IRESH
MASHAL
2026.
Digitally
signed by
IRESH
MASHAL
Date:
2026.09.21
19:15:48
+0530
2. Heard counsel for the parties and we have gone through the
contents of the Interim Application. We are satisfied that a case is
made out for restoration of the Writ Petition which was dismissed
for default.
1/2
Iresh
15-IA-1451-2026.doc
3. In view of the same, Interim Application stands allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a).
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Iresh
Checking your session…