Bombay High Court
ADITYA RAVI CHANRAIversusSALIL RAMESHCHANDRA KINKABWALA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The Court held that the interim application and the writ petition must be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Aditya Ravi Chanrai, filed an interim application and a writ petition (No. 3308 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay. The court observed that the applicant appeared to have lost interest in prosecuting both the interim application and the writ petition. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented by the applicant to advance the proceedings. The court considered whether the lack of prosecution warranted dismissal of the matters. Relying on procedural rules, the court concluded that the appropriate remedy was dismissal for want of prosecution. Consequently, both the interim application and the writ petition were dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the interim application and the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- interim application
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
24 - IA-14932-2023.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 14932 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3308 OF 2023
Aditya Ravi Chanrai Applicant
versus
Salil Rameshchandra
Kinkabwala and Ors Respondents
_______
None for the Applicant.
None for the Respondents.
_______
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 7th SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.
1. None for the Applicant.
2. It seems that the Applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the Interim
Application and the Writ Petition.
3. Interim Application and Writ Petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Bharati
Checking your session…