Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINITA RAJENDRA BHADULE (AKA. VINITA SOMNATH DIKOLE)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY, HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDU. DEPT. AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court restored the writ petition, subject to the petitioner removing the office objections within two weeks.

Summary

The applicant, Vinita Rajendra Bhadule, filed a writ petition which was dismissed by the Registrar on 19 April 2024 for failure to remove office objections within the prescribed time. An interim application (No. 15617 of 2024) was filed seeking restoration of the dismissed petition. The High Court, after considering the application, allowed it and restored the writ petition to its original position, imposing a condition that the petitioner must remove the office objections within two weeks. The interim application was consequently disposed of. No substantive merits of the writ petition were addressed in this order.

Issues considered

  • The Registrar's dismissal of the writ petition for non‑removal of office objections is reviewable.
  • The High Court's power to restore a dismissed writ petition subject to conditions.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • restoration
  • office objections
  • interim application
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                509-IA-15617-2024.doc




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15617 OF 2024
                             IN
             WRIT PETITION(ST) NO. 18703 OF 2024

Vinita Rajendra Bhadule
(aka. Vinita Somnath Dikole)                            ...Applicant
      Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thr
The Secretary, Higher And
Technical Edu. Dept. And Ors                            ...Respondents
                              …..
Mr. Sagar Mane a/w. Rushikesh Jagdale, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for respondents-State.
                               …..

                        CORAM :       R.G. AVACHAT AND
                                      AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

                        DATE      :   28th JANUARY, 2026.
P.C:

1.     Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.

2.     This Interim Application has been filed seeking restoration of

the Writ Petition, which came to be dismissed by order dated 19 th

April 2024 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) for non-removal of

office objections within the stipulated time.

3.     For the reasons stated in the application, the application



                                                                  1 of 2
adn
                                               509-IA-15617-2024.doc


stands allowed. The Writ Petition is restored to its original

position, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall remove

the office objections within a period of two weeks from today.

3.    The Interim Application stands disposed of.



[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]                     [ R.G. AVACHAT J.]




                                                                 2 of 2
adn


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.