Bombay High Court
GAJANAN GOPAL SHINDE AND ORS.versusSUHAS MAHADEO SHITUT AND ORS
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The delay is condoned and the writ petition is restored to its original position.
Summary
The applicants, Gajanan Gopal Shinde and others, filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay and restoration of their writ petition, which had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The court examined whether the delay in filing the application could be excused. It found that the reasons provided justified condoning the delay. Consequently, the court ordered that the writ petition be restored to its original position. The court further directed the petitioner's counsel to comply with the requirement to remove the office objections.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the interim application should be condoned
- Whether the writ petition dismissed for non‑removal of office objections should be restored
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- office objections
- writ petition
- restoration of petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
39-IA-16738-2023=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16738 OF 2023
IN
Digitally
signed by
UDAY WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 11401 OF 2018
UDAY SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI JAGTAP
JAGTAP Date:
2026.09.30
15:34:35
Gajanan Gopal Shinde And Ors. … Applicants
+0530
Vs.
Suhas Mahadeo Shitut And Ors … Respondents
………….
Shubham Gangan i/b Dileep Satale for the Applicants
………….
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P. C. :
. Heard.
2. The applicant seeks condonation of delay and restoration of the
main petition which was dismissed for non removal of office objections.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands
condoned.
4. The Writ Petition shall stand restored to its original position.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall remove the office
objections.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 1
Checking your session…