Bombay High Court
ASHOK MURLIDHAR ASHTEKARversusYOGESH UMESH SANCHETI AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court allowed the interim application and disposed of it.
Summary
The applicant, Ashok Murlidhar Ashtekar, filed an interim application under Criminal Anticipatory Bail No. 1350 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra was the respondent, and an intervenor also filed a supporting application. The primary issue was whether the interim relief sought should be granted pending the final decision on the anticipatory bail. The court considered the submissions of the applicant’s counsel and the arguments presented in the intervention application. Relying on those submissions, the judge found no impediment to granting the interim relief. Consequently, the interim application was allowed and the matter was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the interim application for anticipatory bail should be granted
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- interim application
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- intervention
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
67-IA-1714-2026.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1714 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1350 OF 2026
Ashok Murlidhar Ashtekar ...Applicant/s
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Yogesh Umesh Sancheti And Ors ...Applicant/s
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s
_________________________________________________________________
SONALI by
Digitally signed
SONALI
Mr. Ranjeet V. Sangle i/b. Mr. Vineet Shetty, Mr. Anand R. Bangar, Ms.
SATISH Date:
SATISH KILAJE
KILAJE 2026.09.22
17:58:13 +0530 Shreya Sivaramakrishnan and Ms. Sanjeevani Patil, Advocates for
Intervenor.
Mr. Sanjeev Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w. Seoul Shah, Mr. Chinmay Patil
and Mr. Shahnawaz Siddique, for Applicant in ABA/1350/2026.
Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant
and reasons mentioned in the Intervention Application, Application is
allowed and disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.