Bombay High Court
ARJUN BALU JADHAV(SINCE DECD.THR.LRS) PUSHPA A. JADHAV(DECD. THR.LRS) SURESH ARJUN JADHAV AND ORSversusSUNITA KESHAV GHADASHE AND ANR
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court held that the interim application to record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent should be allowed.
Summary
The applicants filed an interim application in a second appeal to have the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 recorded as parties. The respondents, through their counsel, raised no objection to the filing of the application. The learned Judge examined the content of the application and found it appropriate to allow it. Consequently, the civil application was allowed in accordance with prayer clauses (b) and (c). The Court directed that the amendment reflecting the inclusion of the heirs be filed within two weeks of the order.
Issues considered
- Whether the legal heirs of a deceased respondent can be brought on record through an interim application
Subjects
- interim application
- legal heirs
- succession
- civil procedure
- party impleader
- court order
Judgment
9-IA-1751-2021 (C).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1751 OF 2021
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2016
Arjun Balu Jadhav(since Decd.thr.lrs) Pushpa A. Jadhav(decd.
Thr.lrs) Suresh Arjun Jadhav And Ors ...Applicants
VERSUS
Sunita Keshav Ghadashe And Anr ...Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 779 OF 2017
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2016
Arjun Balu Jadhav (deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors ...Applicants
VERSUS
Sunita Keshav Ghadashe And Anr ...Respondents
___________
Mr. Manoj A. Patil a/w. Ms. Ankita Mali, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Prathamesh Mandlik (Through VC), Advocate for the
respondents.
___________
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 28 AUGUST 2026
P. C. :
1. This interim application has been filed to bring on record the
legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 2.
2. Mr. Prathamesh Mandlik learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the respondents and submits that he has no objection if this
interim application is allowed.
3. I have heard counsel appearing for the parties and gone
through the contents of the interim application. I am convinced the
Rushi 1 of 2
9-IA-1751-2021 (C).docx
application needs to be allowed.
4. Civil application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b)
and (c).
5. Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks from
today.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Rushi 2 of 2
Checking your session…