Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Vasudev Nathu ShelarversusState of Maharashtra

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The revision application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after framing of charge.

Summary

Vasudev Nathu Shelar filed a revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal proceeding by the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the revision application, requesting liberty to file an appropriate application after the charge is framed. The respondent State and a second respondent opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, considered the applicant's request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, the Court permitted the applicant to withdraw the revision application with liberty to file a fresh application later, and ordered the revision application and any pending applications to be disposed of.

Subjects

  • revision
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • application disposal

Judgment

                                                                                              3-IA-178-2026 (CR).doc

                            S.S.Kilaje


                                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 908 OF 2026

                                     Vasudev Nathu Shelar                                     ...Applicant/s
                                     VERSUS
                                     State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                              ...Respondent/s
                                         _________________________________________________________________

                                     Mr. Abhishek Yende a/w Mr. Sagar P. Paspohe and Mr. Ankit Trivedi i/b.
SONALI
SATISH
         Digitally signed
         by SONALI
         SATISH KILAJE
         Date:
                                     Yende Legal Associates, Advocate for Applicant.
                                     Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.
KILAJE   2026.10.01
         14:49:07 +0530




                                     Mr. Sandeep Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2. (Through VC).
                                     PSI – S.S.Shinde, Dighi Police Station, Pimpri Chinchwad, present.
                                     _________________________________________________________________

                                                                          CORAM        : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                          DATE         : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                     P.C. :

                                     1.          Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP and

                                     learned counsel for respondent No.2.

                                     2.          Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave

                                     to withdraw this application with liberty to file appropriate application

                                     after framing of charge.

                                     3.          Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,

                                     Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                     4.          Revision Application is disposed of. All pending application, if

                                     any, also disposed of.

                                                                                     (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)


                                                                       Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.