Bombay High Court
MANISHA CHAUHAN AND ANRversusState of Maharashtra
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court may correct a clerical or typographical error in its order without altering its substantive effect.
Summary
The petitioners, Mrs. Manisha Chauhan & Anr., filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 28 September 2026. The error was in paragraph 4 where "learned counsel for the Applicants/Petitioners" was mistakenly printed instead of "learned counsel for Respondents No. 5". The petitioners argued that the mistake could cause confusion and requested that the order be rectified and the corrected version uploaded. The Court, exercising its inherent powers to correct clerical mistakes, agreed that such a correction does not alter the substantive content of the order. Consequently, the Court directed that the typographical error be corrected and the amended order be uploaded. The application was thereby disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court can correct a typographical error in its own order without affecting the substantive relief granted?
Subjects
- Typographical error
- Correction of order
- Inherent powers of court
- Interim application
- Civil procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1788 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2965 OF 2026
Mrs. Manisha Chauhan & Anr. .. Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Mrs. Manisha Chauhan & Anr. … Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Adv. Rahul Kedar a/w Adv. Rahul Mantril i/b. Gobindram D. Talreja &
Associates, for Petitioners.
Adv. Kezer Kharawala i/b. Lex Juris, for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Date : 6th OCTOBER 2026
P.C. :
1. Motion is made for Speaking to the Minutes of the order dated 28 th
September 2026.
2. Learned counsel for the Applicants submits that there is typographical
error in paragraph No.4, in the first line of the Order. In the First line
“learned counsel for the Applicants/Petitioners” is erroneously typed and
that it should be replaced as “learned counsel for Respondents No. 5”.
1/2
P-1.doc Sufiyan Syed - PA
3. Correction be carried out in the order and corrected order be uploaded.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
2/2
P-1.doc Sufiyan Syed - PA
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.