Bombay High Court
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAIversusVODAFONE IDEA LIMITED - AY 2011-12 ITA 1043/DEL/2016
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The court disposed of the proceedings as withdrawn, permitting the applicant to file appropriate proceedings before the Delhi High Court.
Summary
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai filed several interim applications and income‑tax appeals against Vodafone Idea Ltd. The respondent objected, prompting the applicant’s counsel to state that the applications and appeals would be withdrawn and re‑filed before the Delhi High Court. The Bombay High Court entertained this request and ordered the proceedings to be disposed of as withdrawn. The court granted the applicant liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in Delhi, expressly keeping all contentions open. It also noted that the applicant could avail the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act for any further steps. The judgment was delivered by Justices G. S. Kulkarni and Dr. Neela Gokhale on 28 August 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the interim applications and income‑tax appeals may be withdrawn by the applicant
- Whether the applicant may pursue the matters in the Delhi High Court
- Whether Section 14 of the Limitation Act is applicable to the applicant’s further proceedings
Legislation cited
- Limitation Act — s. 14
Subjects
- Income Tax
- Interim Application
- Withdrawal
- Limitation Act
- Jurisdiction
- High Court
Judgment
305, 317 & 318.IA1938_2026.DOC
2026:BHC-OS:19351-DB
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1938 OF 2026
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 18895 OF 2024
a/w.
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3423 OF 2026
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 18899 OF 2024
a/w.
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3424 OF 2026
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 18904 OF 2024
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5, Mumbai … Applicant/Appellant
Vs.
Vodafone Idea Ltd. … Respondent
_________
Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Sachit Jolly, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Jitendra Singh, Shivali Mhatre and
Rajesh Gaikwad for the respondent.
__________
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 28 AUGUST, 2026.
P.C.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, in view of the objection
raised on behalf of the respondent, fairly states that the Interim Applications as
also the Income-tax Appeals would be withdrawn and would be filed before the
Delhi High Court.
2. We, accordingly, dispose of the proceedings as withdrawn with liberty to
the applicant/appellant to file appropriate proceedings before the Delhi High
Court. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open, including the
benefit of Section 14 of Limitation Act, which may be available to the applicant in
taking further appropriate steps.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Signed by: Vidya S. Amin Page 1 of 1
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge 28 August, 2026
Date: 29/08/2026 15:58:17
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.