Bombay High Court
KAMINI KISHOR SHINDEversusSULOCHANA RAMESH SHINDE
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The three‑day delay in filing the second appeal is condoned.
Summary
The appellant, Kamini Kishor Shinde, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a three‑day delay in filing a second appeal under the Stamp Act. The respondent, Sulochana Ramesh Shinde, did not oppose the application. The court examined the reasons for the delay and considered the short duration of the lapse. Relying on principles of equity and procedural flexibility, the judge found no prejudice to the respondent. Consequently, the application was allowed and the delay was condoned, permitting the second appeal to proceed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of three days in filing a second appeal can be condoned under procedural law
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- second appeal
- interim application
- civil procedure
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:37310
k 1/1 4 ia 20424.22 in sa as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20424 OF 2022
IN
SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.23064 OF 202
Kamini Kishor Shinde ....Appellant
V/S
Sulochana Ramesh Shinde ....Respondent
_________
Ms. Yogita Deshmukh-Chitnis for the Appellant/Applicant.
Mr. Gautam T. Kanchanpurkar for Respondent.
_________
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 9 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.:
1. This Interim Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 3
days in filing the Appeal. The Application is fairly not opposed by
Mr. Kanchanpurkar, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent.
In view of the averments made in the Application and considering the
length of delay, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay in filing the
Second Appeal. Interim Application is accordingly allowed and
disposed of by condoning the delay.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
katkam
Signed by: Sudarshan R. Katkam Page No. 1 of 1
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 10/09/2026 11:41:09
Checking your session…