Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SKG PROJECTS AND ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMTED.versusSKG CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMTED AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, SKG Projects And Engineering Private Limited, failed to appear before the High Court despite being given another opportunity. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. As a result of the dismissal, the interim application filed by the petitioner was also deemed not to survive and was disposed of. No substantive merits of the case were considered. The order was pronounced by Justice Arif S. Doctor on 6 February 2026.

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • interim application
  • high court

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         MEERA                                                  1/1              906-COMMP-514-2022.DOC
MEERA    MAHESH
MAHESH   JADHAV
JADHAV   Date:
         2026.02.09
         13:22:39
         +0530


                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                     COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 514 OF 2022
                      SKG Projects And Engineering Private Limited.                        ...Petitioner
                               Versus
                      SKG Consultants And Engineering Private Limited And Anr.             ...Respondents
                                                              WITH
                                            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2323 OF 2022
                                                                IN
                                     COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 514 OF 2022
                                                             _______
                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Sumeet Moholkar, for the Respondent.
                                                             _______


                                                                 CORAM :       ARIF S. DOCTOR, J
                                                                 DATE      :   6th FEBRUARY 2026
                      P.C.

                      1        The matter was placed today to enable the petitioner one further

                      opportunity to appear. The Petitioner is, however, again absent.

                      2        Petition is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.

                      3       In view of the dismissal of the Petition, the interim application does not

                      survive and is accordingly disposed of.




                                                                               [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]




                      Meera Jadhav


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.