Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SOPAN BHAGWAT JADHAVAR AND ANRversusBHIVA CHANGDEV JADHAVAR AND ORS

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

All interim applications seeking to record the legal heirs were allowed, and the civil application for expedited hearing was disposed.

Summary

The Court considered a series of interim and civil applications filed in a second appeal concerning the Jadhavar family dispute. The applications sought to bring on record the legal heirs of several deceased respondents and to confirm that they had been duly served, despite delays caused by the pandemic. The petitioners argued that the service reports demonstrated proper notice, while the respondents raised concerns about the timing of the filings. After reviewing the service reports and hearing counsel, the Court found that the applications were substantively justified and ordered them to be allowed, directing amendments within two weeks. Additionally, the Court disposed of a civil application requesting an expedited final hearing of the second appeal, directing that the appeal be scheduled as per the roster.

Issues considered

  • Whether interim applications to record legal heirs of deceased parties may be allowed despite delay in filing
  • Whether service of notice on the legal heirs was properly effected
  • Whether the civil application for expeditious hearing of the second appeal should be entertained

Subjects

  • legal heirs
  • service of process
  • interim application
  • second appeal
  • procedural delay
  • pandemic

Judgment

                                                  7-IA(ST)-92203-2020 (C).docx


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

              INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 92203 OF 2020
                                   IN
                     REVIEW PETN. NO. 32763 OF 2017

        Arjun Chandev Jadhavar And Ors                     ...Applicants
                     VERSUS
        Shri. Sopan Bhagwat Jadhvar And Ors             ...Respondents
                                     WITH
                       CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2023
                                      IN
                       SECOND APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2014

        Sopan Bhagwat Jadhavar And Another                ...Applicants
                    VERSUS
        Bhiva Changdev Jadhavar And Others             ...Respondents
                                    WITH
                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2023
                                     IN
                       SECOND APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2014

        Sopan Bhagwat Jadhavar And Another                ...Applicants
                    VERSUS
        Bhiva Changdev Jadhavar And Others             ...Respondents
                                    WITH
                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2023
                                     IN
                       SECOND APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2014

        Sopan Bhagwat Jadhavar And Another              ...Applicants
                    VERSUS
        Bhiva Changdev Jadhavar And Others           ...Respondents
                                    WITH
                       SECOND APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2014

        Sopan Bhagwat Jadhavar And Another              ...Appellants
                    VERSUS
        Bhiva Changdev Jadhavar And Others           ...Respondents
                                    WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2378 OF 2023


Rushi                                  1 of 4
                                                        7-IA(ST)-92203-2020 (C).docx


                                        IN
                            SECOND APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2014

        Sopan Bhagwat Jadhavar And Anr                              ...Applicants
                    VERSUS
        Bhiva Changdev Jadhavar And Ors                          ...Respondents

                                   ___________
        Mr. Balaji Shinde i/b. Ashok B. Tajane, Advocate for Applicant in
        IAST/9203/2020 & for respondent nos. 2 to 7 in IA/2378/2023
        CAS/2623/ CAS/23/23, CAS/24/203.
        Mr. Sandip Patade (Through VC), Advocate appellant/applicant in
        SA & Other applications & Respondent in IAST/92203/2020.
                                   ___________

                                          CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
                                          DATE : 28 AUGUST 2026
        P. C. :

                  INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 92203 OF 2020

        1.        This application has been filed to bring on record legal heirs

        of original petitioner No. 2.

        2.        Heard counsel for both the sides. The deceased died during

        the pandemic. There is some delay in filing the interim application.

        3.        After having heard the counsel for both the sides, I am

        convinced this interim application needs to be allowed.

        4.        Interim application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses

        (a) and (b).


        5.        Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks from

        today.



Rushi                                        2 of 4
                                                          7-IA(ST)-92203-2020 (C).docx


                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2023

        6.       The bailiff remark has not been placed before this Court about

        service being effected on the proposed legal heirs of deceased

        respondent No. 8.

        7.       Registry to place the bailiff's report on record.

        8.       Stand over to 24 September 2026.

                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2023

        9.       This application has been filed to bring on record the legal

        heirs of deceased respondent No. 6. There is some delay in filing this

        application.

        10.      The service report shows that the legal heirs of deceased

        respondent No. 6 have been duly served.

        11.      Heard counsel for the parties and I have gone through the

        contents of the civil application. I am convinced a case is made out

        to allow this civil application.

        12.      Civil application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a),

        (b), and (c).

        13.      Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks from

        today.

                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2378 OF 2023


Rushi                                         3 of 4
                                                          7-IA(ST)-92203-2020 (C).docx


        14.      This interim application has been filed to bring on record the

        legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 3. There is some delay in

        filing the application.

        15.      Office remark shows that the legal heirs of deceased

        respondent No. 3 have been duly served. None appears for the legal

        heirs of deceased respondent No. 3.

        16.      I have heard counsel appearing for the appellant and gone

        through the contents of the interim application. I am convinced the

        application needs to be allowed.

        17.      Interim application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses

        (a), (b), and (c).

        18.      Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks from

        today.

                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2023

        19.      This civil application has been filed seeking expeditious

        hearing of the second appeal.

        20.      The second appeal was admitted on 18 of June, 2014.

        21.      Let this second appeal come up for final hearing as per roster.

        22.      Civil application stands disposed of.


                                                         [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]


Rushi                                        4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.