Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HARPREET MANSUKHANI SAIGALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

A party‑in‑person may be permitted to assist counsel, and the interim application seeking such permission is allowed.

Summary

In a criminal writ petition (W.P. No. 1612 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Ms. Harpreet Mansukhani Saigal, appearing in person, sought permission to assist the learned counsel, Shri Nilesh Ojha, representing the petitioner, Satish Salian. The interim application was filed to obtain the court's approval for such assistance. The court examined whether a party‑in‑person could be permitted to aid counsel in the proceedings. Finding no legal impediment, the judges allowed the request and ordered that the interim application be withdrawn. Consequently, the application was disposed of, and the party‑in‑person was permitted to assist the counsel.

Issues considered

  • Whether a party‑in‑person may be permitted to assist counsel in a criminal writ petition

Subjects

  • interim application
  • assistance to counsel
  • party-in-person
  • criminal writ petition
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                      Gokhale                          1 of 2                 6-IA-2392-25


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2392 OF 2025
                                                    IN
                                  CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1612 OF 2025

                     Harpreet Mansukhani Saigal                        ..Applicant

                     IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

                     Satish Salian                                     ..Petitioner
                           Versus
                     State of Maharashtra & Ors.                       ..Respondents
                                                __________

                     Ms. Harpreet Mansukhani Saigal, Applicant-in-person present.

                     Mr. Nilesh Ojha a/w. Abhishek Mishra, Vijay Kurle, Partho Sarkar,
                     Shivchand Mishra, Ishwarlal Agarwal, Meena Thakur, Anushka
                     Sonawane, Devkrishna Bhambri, Shivam Gupta, Ayush Tiwari,
                     Sonal Manchekar, Priyanka Sharma, Dipeeka Patil, Ranjeet Yadav,
                     Jairam Yadav, Sumer Singh and Kamlesh Soni for Petitioner in
                     W.P./1612/2025.
                                               __________

                                        CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
                                                RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.

                                        DATE   : 24 AUGUST 2026
                     PC :

                     1.           The party in person who appears in this Interim

                     Application does not press this interim application. She seeks

                     permission to assist Shri. Nilesh Ojha, learned counsel for the

        Digitally
        signed by
        VINOD
VINOD   BHASKAR
BHASKAR GOKHALE
GOKHALE Date:
        2026.08.25
        18:06:27
        +0530
                                   2 of 2                  6-IA-2392-25


Petitioner in Writ Petition No.1612 of 2025.


2.        Considering her request, this interim application is

allowed to be withdrawn. She is permitted to assist learned

counsel Shri. Nilesh Ojha.


3.        The Interim Application is disposed of.




(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.)             (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.