Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JYOTI D THAKKAR AND 3 ORSversusNANDBALA NATHALA MAYANI 5 ORS

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court permitted the filing of a fresh vakalatnama and upheld the electronic service of notice, staying the proceedings until 17 September 2026.

Summary

In an execution proceeding, the claimant Nandbala Nathala Mayani died, prompting the applicants to seek permission to bring the legal representatives before the court. The applicants intend to file a fresh vakalatnama to cure defects in the previously digitally signed one. The court noted that notice to Respondent No.4 was effected via WhatsApp and email and directed that an affidavit be filed on that basis. It also observed that Respondent No.3, Rasila Mayani, had died. The judge ordered that the applicants may file the fresh vakalatnama within a week and adjourned the matter to 17 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicants may be allowed to file a fresh vakalatnama to represent the deceased claimant
  • Whether service of notice via electronic means (WhatsApp and email) is sufficient

Subjects

  • execution
  • interim application
  • legal representatives
  • vakalatnama
  • electronic service
  • stay of proceedings

Judgment

                                                                                       59 Ia-2436-2024.doc




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2436 OF 2024
                                                 IN
                                EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 530 OF 2011

                     Jyoti D Thakkar And 3 Ors                                ...Applicants

                                  Vs.

                     Nandbala Nathala Mayani 5 Ors.                           ...Respondents

                                                          *****
                          Adv. Vidhi Mehta i/by          Advocate for the Applicants
                          Adv. Hemal Ganatra
                          Adv. Jesal Shah                Advocate for the Respondent No. 1

                                                          *****
                                         CORAM :             S. M. MODAK, J.

                                         DATE        :      27th AUGUST 2026

                     P. C. :-

                     1.      Heard both the sides.

                     2.      The Claimant Nandbala Nathala Mayani has expired. Interim

                     Application No. 2436 of 2024 is for bringing legal representatives.

                     Learned Advocate intends to file fresh vakalatnama for the legal

                     representatives thereby removing certain defects in the earlier

        Digitally
        signed by
                     vakalatnama. She can do so within one week.
        SEEMA
SEEMA KSHITIJ
KSHITIJ YELKAR
YELKAR Date:
        2026.08.28
        16:43:08
        +0530
                     Seema                                                                           1/2
                                                            59 Ia-2436-2024.doc




3.      The notice about service on Respondent No. 4 is effected

through WhatsApp and email. Affidavit be filed. Whereas Respondent

No. 3-Rasila Mayani has expired. They want to take certain steps.

4.      Stand over to 17th September 2026.


                                        [S. M. MODAK, J.]




Seema                                                                     2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.