Bombay High Court
JAGDISHDAS GURU BABUDAS PANDIT (DECD.) BY HEIRSversusKISAN CHANDRAPAL PARDESHI AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court condoned the delay and allowed the interim applications, permitting amendment within three weeks.
Summary
The Bombay High Court entertained two interim applications (Nos. 2549 and 2550 of 2026) filed by the petitioners seeking condonation of delay in filing the applications. The court observed that the respondents had been served but none appeared, and there was no opposition to the condonation. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court condoned the delay and allowed the applications in accordance with the prayer clauses. It directed that the required amendments be effected within three weeks. The order was pronounced by Justice Gauri Godse.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the interim applications can be condoned
- Whether the petitioners may be permitted to amend their pleadings
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- interim application
- amendment of pleadings
- civil procedure
Judgment
69-ia-2549-2026-wp-3235-2002.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
varsha
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2549 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2002
Jagdishdas Guru Babudas Pandit … Applicants/Petitioners
(deceased) by heirs
vs.
Kisan Chandrapal Pardeshi and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge a/w. Yesh Gangal for the Petitioners
Ms. Ashwini Jadhav i/b. Mr. Jagdish G. Reddy for Respondent Nos.
1A to 1E, 4 and 8.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
Digitally
signed by
DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026
VARSHA
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
2026.09.16
19:18:37
+0530
ORDER:
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2549 OF 2026.
1. Office remark shows that respondent nos. 3(A) to 3(D) are
served.
2. There is a delay in filing this application. The delay is
explained in the application. There is no opposition for condonation
of delay. Though served, none appears for the proposed
respondents.
Page no. 1 of 2
69-ia-2549-2026-wp-3235-2002.doc
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and for the
reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the
application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
4. Amendment to be carried out within three weeks.
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2550 OF 2026
5. Not on board. Taken on the board.
6. Office remark shows that respondent nos. 2(A) to 2(C) are
served.
7. There is a delay in filing this application. The delay is
explained in the application. There is no opposition for condonation
of delay. Though served, none appears for the proposed
respondents.
8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and for the
reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the
application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
9. Amendment to be carried out within three weeks.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 2 of 2
Checking your session…