Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAVINDRA DUDUGUversusM/S MACTEC REALTORS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), with directions for consequential amendment and service.

Summary

The Bombay High Court was hearing Interim Application No.2658 of 2026 in Writ Petition No.823 of 2026. The application was moved by Ravindra Dudugu, described as Intervenor/Applicant. The writ petition is between Laxmi Shankar Ande and Anr. as Petitioners and Mactec Realtors and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. as Respondents. After hearing the advocates for the parties, the Court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause (a). The Court directed the Petitioners to carry out the consequential amendment within two weeks and to serve the amended copy on all concerned. The matter was listed on 16th June 2026, and any affidavit-in-reply was to be filed within four weeks. The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Interim Application No.2658 of 2026 in Writ Petition No.823 of 2026 should be allowed?

Subjects

  • Interim Application
  • Intervention
  • Amendment
  • Writ Petition
  • Bombay High Court
  • Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Affidavit-in-Reply

Judgment

                                                               13-IA-2658-2026-IN-WP-823-2026.doc


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2658 OF 2026
SATISH                                                IN
RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR                                   WRIT PETITION NO.823 OF 2026
Digitally signed by
SATISH RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR                Ravindra Dudugu                                  ...Intervenor/Applicant
Date: 2026.04.15
18:31:18 +0530

                      In the matter between:-

                      Laxmi Shankar Ande and Anr.                            ...Petitioners
                             V/s.
                      Mactec Realtors and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
                      and Ors.                                               ...Respondents

                                                       *****
                      Mr.Ritik Gupta, Advocate for Intervenor/Applicant.
                      Mr.A.J.Rizvi, Advocate for Petitioners.
                      Mr.Bharat Jain a/w Mr.Priyank Priyadarshi i/b. Jain and Jain Law
                      Associates, Advocates for Respondent No.1.
                      Mr.D.R.Kawale, Advocate for Respondent No.4 – BMC.
                      Ms.Sayali Apte i/b. Mr.P.G.Lad, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2,3 and
                      5 – MHADA.
                      Ms.Reena A. Salunkhe, AGP, for Respondents-State.
                                                       *****
                                                CORAM     :      M.S.KARNIK &
                                                                 S. M. MODAK, JJ.
                                                DATE      :      10th APRIL 2026
                      P. C. :-

                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2658 OF 2026

                      1.     For the reasons mentioned in the Application, the Application is


                      Satish Sangar                                                            1/2
                                           13-IA-2658-2026-IN-WP-823-2026.doc


allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Consequent amendment to be

carried out by the Petitioners within a period of 2 weeks. Amended

copy be served on all the concerned.

2.     List on 16th June 2026.

3.     Affidavit-in-Reply, if any, to be filed in the Office within a period

of 4 weeks from today.



(S. M. MODAK, J.)                                     (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Satish Sangar                                                              2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.