Bombay High Court

Suhas Sahadev ThakareversusVikas Sahadev Thakare

Decided: 7 July 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: ARIF S DOCTOR

Holding

The court held that the post‑grant amendment to the schedule of properties is permissible.

Summary

The applicant filed an interim application seeking a post‑grant amendment to the schedule of properties listed in a previously granted Letters of Administration. The original grant, dated 13 February 2018, named the deceased as Vikas Sahadev Thakare. After the grant, the applicant discovered that the Client ID in the schedule was incorrect. Counsel for the applicant argued that the schedule should be corrected. The court examined the application and, relying on the prayer clause (a), found that the amendment was permissible. Consequently, the interim application was allowed and the matter disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether a post‑grant amendment to the schedule of properties in a Letters of Administration can be permitted when an error in the Client ID is discovered.

Subjects

interim application
post‑grant amendment
schedule of properties
letters of administration
testamentary petition
court order

Judgment

                                          1/2               52-IA-2710-2026 (OS).DOC




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION


                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2710 OF 2026
                                           IN
                     TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1764 OF 2017
Suhas Sahadev Thakare                                                  ...Applicant
          Versus
Vikas Sahadev Thakare                                                  ...Respondent
                                       _______
Mr. Prabhu Velar a/w Ms. Bhakti Santosh Patil, for the Applicant.
                                       _______


                                                CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                                DATE    : 7th JULY, 2026


P.C.
1.        The Interim Application has been filed seeking a post grant amendment to

the Schedule of Properties belonging to the deceased as set out in the captioned

Testamentary Petition.

2.        This Court had, by a detailed order dated 13 th February 2018, granted the

Applicant Letters of Administration in respect of the properties stated to belong

to one Vikas Sahadev Thakare.

3.        Mr. Velar, learned counsel for the Applicant points out after the issuance

of the grant, it came to the Applicant's knowledge that the Client ID mentioned

in the schedule of assets was incorrect. It is for this purpose that the present

Interim Application has been filed.

4.        Having heard Mr. Velar and having perused the Interim Application, I am

satisfied that the same would have to be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).



Vaibhav
                                           2/2              52-IA-2710-2026 (OS).DOC



5.        Hence, the Interim Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.




                                                               [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]




Vaibhav

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.