Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JAYSHREE TUSHAR SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court declined to grant anticipatory bail but conditioned the applicants' liberty on their cooperation with the investigation and ordered that they not be arrested pending further hearing.

Summary

The applicants, Amit Pashamlal Bhatia and his spouse, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (No. 388/2026) was lodged alleging they failed to procure purchase orders from D‑Mart and Wall‑Mart despite receiving Rs. 20.63 lakh, invoking Section 318(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants argued that the matter was a civil commercial dispute, the FIR was delayed by over six months, and they were ready to cooperate with the investigation. The complainant countered that the applicants misrepresented procurement, produced forged documents, and that an investigation was necessary. The court observed that while the allegations appear to stem from a civil transaction, the documents presented warrant scrutiny, and therefore the applicants must appear before the police and disclose all related documents. Subject to these conditions, the court ordered that the applicants not be arrested until the next hearing, and listed the anticipatory bail application for further consideration on 7 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the allegations constitute a cognizable offence warranting anticipatory bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the FIR is merely a civil dispute and therefore does not justify criminal proceedings.
  • Whether the applicants should be granted protection from arrest pending investigation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • civil commercial dispute
  • FIR delay
  • Section 318
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • investigation
  • forged documents
  • cooperation with police

Judgment

                                        5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


        ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2026

Amit Pashamlal Bhatia And Anr.                           …Applicants
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr.                        …Respondents

                            WITH
            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2767 OF 2026
                               IN
      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2026
Jayshree Tushar Shah                         …Intervener
                                             (Original
                                             Complainant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :-
Amit Pashamlal Bhatia And Anr.               …Applicants
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                     …Respondent


Adv. Prateei Thakur a/w Adv. Yash Tated, for the Applicants.

Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State.

Adv. Mubin H. Solkar a/w Adv. Tahir Hussain, Adv. Anas K. Shaikh,
Adv. Mehrosh Solkar, Adv. Tahera Qureshi, Adv. Zahid Burud,
Adv. Somania, Adv. Hemal Shah, Adv. Yakub Shaikh i/b Adv. Yusuf
Mithi, for Intervener.

API Vivek Bairagi, Nehru Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, is present.


                     CORAM :           PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                     DATE          :   24TH AUGUST 2026
P.C:-


                              Page 1 of 5
                              th
                            24 August 2026
                                        5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT




              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2767 OF 2026

1.     This is an application for intervention filed on behalf of

the original complainant.


2.     The applicants have no objection for allowing the

application.


3.     Considering the fact that this is an application by the

original complainant and no objection given by the applicant,

the   application    is     allowed    and     disposed    of.     Necessary

amendment be carried out.

      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2026

4.     Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned

APP for respondent-State and learned counsel for complainant /

respondent no.2.


5.     The applicants are apprehending arrest in Crime No. 388

of    2026,    registered    with     Nehru     Nagar     Police    Station,

Brihanmumbai, for the offence punishable under Section 318(4)

read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.




                                Page 2 of 5
                                th
                              24 August 2026
                                    5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT




6.    Learned counsel for applicants submit that the offence is

registered with respect to certain commercial transactions in

between complainant and the applicants. The FIR is registered

on the basis of report lodged by the complainant alleging that

the applicant nos. 1 and 2, who are husband and wife, have

failed to procure purchase orders from D-Mart and Wall-Mart

despite acceptance of an amount of Rs. 20,63,000/- from time

to time.


7.    Learned counsel for applicants submits that there is delay

of more than six months in lodging FIR. She also states that the

transactions are purely civil in nature and in this regard invites

attention to the notice dated 6th March 2026 (Exh-E) which is a

notice for recovery of Rs. 20,63,000/- sent on behalf of the

complainant. She states that there are no criminal antecedents

against these applicants and they are ready to extend co-

operation to the investigation agency.


8.    The application is opposed by the learned APP for

respondent-State as well as learned counsel for complainant.




                            Page 3 of 5
                            th
                          24 August 2026
                                     5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT




9.    Learned counsel for complainant/respondent no.2 submits

that the applicants have misrepresented that they have procured

certain orders from D-Mart and Wall-Mart and have also secured

some vendor code from Wall-Mart. It is also submitted that the

applicants have obtained huge amount from time to time but

have failed to procure any order for supply of drawing books,

etc., as was initially agreed. It is also stated that the documents

put forth by the applicants for the purpose pretending that the

purchase orders are in process, are forged and an investigation

needs to be conducted in that regard.


10.   Considering the nature of allegations, it prima facie

appears that there is a civil transaction with respect which the

notice of recovery is already sent by the complainant. However,

as regards the documents produced by the applicants in the

nature of supply orders and vendor code, an investigation needs

to be conducted.


11.   Considering the nature of offence, the presence of these

applicants can be secured by directing the applicants to attend

the police station and extend co-operation. Hence, applicants

are directed to attend the police station on Friday 28 th August


                             Page 4 of 5
                            th
                          24 August 2026
                                                5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT




2026 and 31st August 2026 in between 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

and as and when called upon by the investigating agency. The

applicants are directed to disclose the source of all the

documents in the nature of vendor registration form and vendor

agreements          and     all   other   documents,         if   demanded     by

investigating agency. Subject to these conditions, the applicants

shall not be arrested till next date.


12.         List   the    application     for      further   consideration     on

7th September 2026.




                                            (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
VDMokal/-




                                     Page 5 of 5
                                     th
                                   24 August 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.