Bombay High Court
JAYSHREE TUSHAR SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court declined to grant anticipatory bail but conditioned the applicants' liberty on their cooperation with the investigation and ordered that they not be arrested pending further hearing.
Summary
The applicants, Amit Pashamlal Bhatia and his spouse, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (No. 388/2026) was lodged alleging they failed to procure purchase orders from D‑Mart and Wall‑Mart despite receiving Rs. 20.63 lakh, invoking Section 318(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants argued that the matter was a civil commercial dispute, the FIR was delayed by over six months, and they were ready to cooperate with the investigation. The complainant countered that the applicants misrepresented procurement, produced forged documents, and that an investigation was necessary. The court observed that while the allegations appear to stem from a civil transaction, the documents presented warrant scrutiny, and therefore the applicants must appear before the police and disclose all related documents. Subject to these conditions, the court ordered that the applicants not be arrested until the next hearing, and listed the anticipatory bail application for further consideration on 7 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the allegations constitute a cognizable offence warranting anticipatory bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether the FIR is merely a civil dispute and therefore does not justify criminal proceedings.
- Whether the applicants should be granted protection from arrest pending investigation.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 318(4), 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- civil commercial dispute
- FIR delay
- Section 318
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- investigation
- forged documents
- cooperation with police
Judgment
5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2026
Amit Pashamlal Bhatia And Anr. …Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. …Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2767 OF 2026
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2026
Jayshree Tushar Shah …Intervener
(Original
Complainant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :-
Amit Pashamlal Bhatia And Anr. …Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Adv. Prateei Thakur a/w Adv. Yash Tated, for the Applicants.
Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State.
Adv. Mubin H. Solkar a/w Adv. Tahir Hussain, Adv. Anas K. Shaikh,
Adv. Mehrosh Solkar, Adv. Tahera Qureshi, Adv. Zahid Burud,
Adv. Somania, Adv. Hemal Shah, Adv. Yakub Shaikh i/b Adv. Yusuf
Mithi, for Intervener.
API Vivek Bairagi, Nehru Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, is present.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 24TH AUGUST 2026
P.C:-
Page 1 of 5
th
24 August 2026
5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2767 OF 2026
1. This is an application for intervention filed on behalf of
the original complainant.
2. The applicants have no objection for allowing the
application.
3. Considering the fact that this is an application by the
original complainant and no objection given by the applicant,
the application is allowed and disposed of. Necessary
amendment be carried out.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2026
4. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned
APP for respondent-State and learned counsel for complainant /
respondent no.2.
5. The applicants are apprehending arrest in Crime No. 388
of 2026, registered with Nehru Nagar Police Station,
Brihanmumbai, for the offence punishable under Section 318(4)
read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Page 2 of 5
th
24 August 2026
5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT
6. Learned counsel for applicants submit that the offence is
registered with respect to certain commercial transactions in
between complainant and the applicants. The FIR is registered
on the basis of report lodged by the complainant alleging that
the applicant nos. 1 and 2, who are husband and wife, have
failed to procure purchase orders from D-Mart and Wall-Mart
despite acceptance of an amount of Rs. 20,63,000/- from time
to time.
7. Learned counsel for applicants submits that there is delay
of more than six months in lodging FIR. She also states that the
transactions are purely civil in nature and in this regard invites
attention to the notice dated 6th March 2026 (Exh-E) which is a
notice for recovery of Rs. 20,63,000/- sent on behalf of the
complainant. She states that there are no criminal antecedents
against these applicants and they are ready to extend co-
operation to the investigation agency.
8. The application is opposed by the learned APP for
respondent-State as well as learned counsel for complainant.
Page 3 of 5
th
24 August 2026
5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT
9. Learned counsel for complainant/respondent no.2 submits
that the applicants have misrepresented that they have procured
certain orders from D-Mart and Wall-Mart and have also secured
some vendor code from Wall-Mart. It is also submitted that the
applicants have obtained huge amount from time to time but
have failed to procure any order for supply of drawing books,
etc., as was initially agreed. It is also stated that the documents
put forth by the applicants for the purpose pretending that the
purchase orders are in process, are forged and an investigation
needs to be conducted in that regard.
10. Considering the nature of allegations, it prima facie
appears that there is a civil transaction with respect which the
notice of recovery is already sent by the complainant. However,
as regards the documents produced by the applicants in the
nature of supply orders and vendor code, an investigation needs
to be conducted.
11. Considering the nature of offence, the presence of these
applicants can be secured by directing the applicants to attend
the police station and extend co-operation. Hence, applicants
are directed to attend the police station on Friday 28 th August
Page 4 of 5
th
24 August 2026
5-ABA-2200-2026 W IA-2767-2026.ODT
2026 and 31st August 2026 in between 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
and as and when called upon by the investigating agency. The
applicants are directed to disclose the source of all the
documents in the nature of vendor registration form and vendor
agreements and all other documents, if demanded by
investigating agency. Subject to these conditions, the applicants
shall not be arrested till next date.
12. List the application for further consideration on
7th September 2026.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
VDMokal/-
Page 5 of 5
th
24 August 2026
Checking your session…