Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DILIP PANDURANG SURYAVANSHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court allowed the complainant’s intervention in the anticipatory bail application.

Summary

The High Court considered an interim application filed by the original complainant seeking to intervene in an anticipatory bail application (No. 1940 of 2026) filed by Ashok Kumar Shetty. The complainant argued for the right to assist the prosecution. The Court held that a complainant may intervene in such proceedings and allowed the application. The Court directed the applicant to amend the bail application and ordered the accused’s counsel to furnish the intervenor with the relevant documents. The matter was listed for final disposal on 23 September 2026, with interim protection previously granted to continue.

Issues considered

  • Whether the original complainant has the locus standi to intervene in an anticipatory bail application
  • Procedural requirements for intervention by a complainant in criminal bail proceedings

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • intervention
  • criminal procedure
  • locus standi
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                 915-ABA-1940-2026.doc

vaishnavi

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1940 OF 2026


            Ashok Kumar Shetty @ Ashok Vyas                  ...Applicant
                       V/s.
            State of Maharashtra                             ...Respondent
                                          WITH
                            INTERIM APPLICATION 2788 OF 2026
                                           IN
                    ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1940 OF 2026

            Dilip Pandurang Suryavanshi                               ...Applicant
                       V/s.
            State of Maharashtra                                      ...Respondent


            Mr. Ashok Shukla a/w Mr. Dilip Gupta, for the Applicant.
            Mr. Mehul Thakur, for Original Complainant.
            Mr.Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for the Respondent – State.
            API – Mr. Sachin Sanap, Crime Unit-I, MBVV is present.


                              CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                              DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
            P.C. :-

                             INTERIM APPLICATION 2788 OF 2026

            1.           This is an application for intervention by the complainant.

            2.           Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as counsel

            for the accused. In view of the fact that this is application made by the

            complainant seeking intervention for the purpose of assisting the


                                                1/2
                                                     915-ABA-1940-2026.doc

procecution, the same is allowed.

2.            Applicant is directed to carry out necessary amendment

forthwith. The counsel for the accused is directed to supply a copy of

the application along with the documents to the counsel for the

intervener.

3.            List the matter for final disposal on 23 rd September 2026.

Interim protection granted earlier shall continue till the next date.



                                          (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)




                                    2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.