Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH ASHOK LONDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH P P OFFICE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the operative order may be corrected to incorporate the omitted case reference.

Summary

The applicant, Ganesh Ashok Londhe, filed an interim application (praecipe) seeking correction of the operative order dated 25th August 2026. The applicant contended that Criminal Case No. 737/PW/2002 was omitted from clause (i) of the order granting bail. Counsel for the applicant submitted that the omission should be rectified to reflect the bail conditions for the said case. The Court examined the submission and found no substantive objection to the correction. Consequently, the Court ordered that clause (i) be amended to include the reference to CC No. 737/PW/2002 and the bail terms. The corrected order now authorises the applicant’s enlargement on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the operative order can be corrected to include the omitted reference to Criminal Case No. 737/PW/2002.

Subjects

  • bail
  • correction of order
  • praecipe
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • interim application

Judgment

                                                                           Praecipe-IA-2894-2026-(CR).doc


      Shubhada S Kadam

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                          INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2894 OF 2026
                                                           in
                                     CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 419 OF 2026

                      Ganesh Ashok Londhe                              ...Applicant/s
                      Versus
                      The State of Maharashtra                         ...Respondent/s
                      ________________________________________________________________

                      Mr. Pankaj D. Purway along with Mr. Shubham Yadav and Mr. Sidhanshu
                      Singh, Advocate for Applicant.
                      Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                               CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                               DATE        :   1st September, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.             The above matter is moved by way of praecipe for speaking to
                      the minutes of order dated 25th August 2026.
                      2.             Learned   counsel   for   the    applicant   submitted    that   CC
                      No.737/PW/2002 is not mentioned in clause (i) of the operative order and
                      requested to mention it.
                      3.             Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,
                      the clause (i) of the operative order be corrected as under
                               “i.    The applicant be enlarged on bail in
                                      connection with CC No.737/PW/2002 on furnishing
                                      P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or
                                      two sureties in the like amount.”


                                                                        (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.01
17:04:13 +0530

                                                          Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.