Bombay High Court
GANESH ASHOK LONDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH P P OFFICE
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that the operative order may be corrected to incorporate the omitted case reference.
Summary
The applicant, Ganesh Ashok Londhe, filed an interim application (praecipe) seeking correction of the operative order dated 25th August 2026. The applicant contended that Criminal Case No. 737/PW/2002 was omitted from clause (i) of the order granting bail. Counsel for the applicant submitted that the omission should be rectified to reflect the bail conditions for the said case. The Court examined the submission and found no substantive objection to the correction. Consequently, the Court ordered that clause (i) be amended to include the reference to CC No. 737/PW/2002 and the bail terms. The corrected order now authorises the applicant’s enlargement on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with one or two sureties of equal amount.
Issues considered
- Whether the operative order can be corrected to include the omitted reference to Criminal Case No. 737/PW/2002.
Subjects
- bail
- correction of order
- praecipe
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- interim application
Judgment
Praecipe-IA-2894-2026-(CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2894 OF 2026
in
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 419 OF 2026
Ganesh Ashok Londhe ...Applicant/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s
________________________________________________________________
Mr. Pankaj D. Purway along with Mr. Shubham Yadav and Mr. Sidhanshu
Singh, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 1st September, 2026.
P.C. :
1. The above matter is moved by way of praecipe for speaking to
the minutes of order dated 25th August 2026.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that CC
No.737/PW/2002 is not mentioned in clause (i) of the operative order and
requested to mention it.
3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant,
the clause (i) of the operative order be corrected as under
“i. The applicant be enlarged on bail in
connection with CC No.737/PW/2002 on furnishing
P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or
two sureties in the like amount.”
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.01
17:04:13 +0530
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…