Bombay High Court

BEEF DEALERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED MEMBER, MR. RAISMIYA ABDUL AZIZ QURESHIversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND 3 ORS.

Decided: 25 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the interim application should be allowed and the writ petition restored to the file.

Summary

The Beef Dealers Welfare Association filed Writ Petition (L) No.8662 of 2023 against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The Association moved Interim Application No.3 of 2025 seeking restoration of the writ petition after earlier objections were removed. The respondents opposed the interim application. The High Court, after hearing counsel, found that the objections had indeed been withdrawn and allowed the interim application. Consequently, the writ petition was restored to the file, the interim application was disposed of, and the petition was listed for admission on 7 September 2026.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate disposition of Interim Application No.3 of 2025 seeking restoration of the writ petition?
Whether the removal of all objections justifies the restoration of the writ petition to the court's file.

Subjects

interim application
writ petition
restoration
admission
civil procedure
Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                41-IA-3-2025.doc


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2025
                                 IN
              WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 8662 OF 2023
Beef Dealers Welfare Association              .....Applicant
Through its Authorized Member
              Versus

 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and .....Respondents
 Ors.
                               .....
Mr. Gauraj Shah a/w Mr. Harjot Singh and Ms. Shaheen Siddiqui, for
the Applicant.

Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, Senior Cousnsel a/w Ms. Jyoti Mhatre i/b
Ms. Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent-BMC.

Mr. Ravindra Diwekar, Assistant Superintendent of Market, present in
Court.
                                 ..…
                           CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                      SANDESH D.PATIL, JJ.
                                    DATE   : 25th AUGUST 2026
P.C.:-

1.        Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.


2.        Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, learned Senior Counsel opposed the

Application.


3.        For the reasons mentioned in the Application, we are satisfied

that the the Interim Application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly,

Manisha                                                                    1/2
              Digitally signed by
MANISHA    MANISHA
           BALKRISHNA
BALKRISHNA TALEKAR
TALEKAR    Date: 2026.08.27
              10:54:25 +0530
                                                            41-IA-3-2025.doc


Writ Petition (L) No.8662 of 2023 is restored to file.


4.        Learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that all the

objections have been removed.


5.        Accordingly, Interim Application No.3 of 2025 stands disposed

of.


6.        List the Writ Petition (L) No.8662 of 2023 on 7 th September,

2026 for admission.




(SANDESH D.PATIL, J.)                             (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Manisha                                                                2/2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.