Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANIL HARILAL GANDHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The bailable warrant issued against Applicant/Appellant No.3 in Criminal Appeal No.403 of 2012 is recalled.

Summary

The Bombay High Court, on 30 September 2026, recalled a bailable warrant that had been issued against Applicant/Appellant No.3 in Criminal Appeal No.403 of 2012. The court disposed of Interim Application No.3022 of 2026, which sought relief concerning the warrant. No substantive discussion of facts or legal arguments was recorded in the order. The court also directed that the pending appeals be listed for hearing on 14 October 2026. The order was pronounced by Justice N.R. Borkar.

Subjects

  • bailable warrant
  • interim application
  • criminal appeal
  • order recall
  • listing of appeals

Judgment

                                                          1              21-APEAL 403-12.doc



                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.403 OF 2012

                       Mohd. Zuber Abdul Razak Khatri & Ors.        … Appellants
                             Vs.
                       The State of Maharashtra                     … Respondent

                                                        WITH
                                         INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3022 OF 2026
                                                         IN
                                           CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.403 OF 2012

                       Mr. Anil Harilal Gandhi                      … Applicant/Appellant No.3
                             Vs.
                       The State of Maharashtra                     … Respondent
                                                         WITH
                                         CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.427 OF 2012
                                                         WITH
          Digitally                      CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.488 OF 2012
          signed by

MUGDHA
          MUGDHA
          MANOJ
                                                          -----
MANOJ     PARANJAPE
PARANJAPE Date:        Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal i/by B. D. Shinde for Appellant No.2 in Appeal No.403
          2026.09.30
          18:01:59
          +0530
                       of 2012.
                       Mr. Dipak Churi a/w Mr. Madukar Yelutla for Appellant No.3 in Appeal
                       No.403 of 2012/Applicant in IA No.3022 of 2026.
                       Mr. Rahul Gupta i/by Nazish Syed for Appellant No.4 in Appeal No.403 of
                       2012.
                       Mr. Mitesh Lakhotia i/by Shubham Shingade for the Appellant in Appeal
                       No.488 of 2012.
                       Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                                          -----

                                                        CORAM :     N.R. BORKAR, J.
                                                        DATE    :   30TH SEPTEMBER 2026
                       P.C. :


                       1.       For the reasons stated in Interim Application No.3022 of 2026, the


                            Mugdha                                                             1 of 2
                                    2              21-APEAL 403-12.doc



order dated 30th June 2026 issuing bailable warrant against the
Applicant/Appellant No.3 in Criminal Appeal No.403 of 2012 is hereby
recalled.


2.       Interim Application No.3022 of 2026 is disposed of.


3.       List the Appeals on 14th October 2026.


                                              (N.R. BORKAR, J.)




     Mugdha                                                              2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.