Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Avinash Vishwanath RaiversusState of Maharashtra

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a fresh one disclosing the applicant's criminal antecedents.

Summary

The applicant, Manish Dinesh Chandra Verma, filed an anticipatory bail application and sought the court's permission to withdraw it, agreeing to disclose all criminal antecedents as mandated by the Supreme Court in Zeba Khan v. State of U.P. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted and whether liberty could be granted to file a fresh application with full disclosure. Relying on the precedent, the bench allowed the withdrawal and granted liberty to file a new application disclosing the antecedents. Consequently, the pending interim application was also disposed of. The order effectively clears the current applications while preserving the applicant's right to re‑apply with the required disclosures.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application disclosing criminal antecedents
  • Whether the court should grant such liberty in accordance with the Supreme Court's direction in Zeba Khan v. State of U.P.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal antecedents
  • Supreme Court precedent
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                                          2-ABA-2087-2026 W IA-3026-2026.ODT




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
         ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2087 OF 2026
Manish Dinesh Chandra Verma                  …Applicant
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                     …Respondent
                           WITH
            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3026 OF 2026
                             IN
      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2087 OF 2026
Avinash Vishwanath Rai                       …Applicant
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                     …Respondent


Adv. Niranjan Mundargi, for the Applicant.

Mrs. Megha S. Bajoria, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State.

PSI Ashok Chavan, Juhu Police Station, Mumbai, is present.



                      CORAM :          PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                      DATE        :     28TH SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C:-

1.       Learned counsel for applicant, on instructions, seeks

permission to withdraw the instant application with liberty to

file fresh application by disclosing all the criminal antecedents

in accordance with judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

matter of Zeba Khan Vs. State of U.P. and Ors., reported at 2026

SCC Online SC 188.




                                  Page 1 of 2
                             th
                          28 September 2026
                                             2-ABA-2087-2026 W IA-3026-2026.ODT




2.          Accordingly, the instant Application is permitted to be

withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

3.          In view of the above, pending interim application is also

disposed of.




                                           (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
VDMokal/-




                                     Page 2 of 2
                                th
                              28 September 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.