Bombay High Court
ANIL MITTAL S/O SH. VED PRAKASHversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Look-Out Circular had been deleted, and therefore the petition was disposed of.
Summary
Anil Mittal filed a writ petition challenging the existence of a Look-Out Circular (LOC) issued against him. The respondents, representing the Union of India and others, submitted an interim application stating that the LOC had been deleted. The court recorded and accepted this statement. Consequently, the court found that no issue remained for adjudication. The petition and the connected interim application were therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the Look-Out Circular issued against the petitioner remains in force
Subjects
- Look-Out Circular
- interim application
- petition disposal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
906-WP(ST)-17628-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.17628 OF 2024
IN
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3053 OF 2026
Anil Mittal S/O Sh. Ved Prakash ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Union Of India and Anr. ... Respondents
****
Adv. Jasmin Purani a/w Mr. Rahul Agarwal i/b A & D Legal, Advocates
Digitally
signed by
for the Petitioner.
SHARADA
RANGNATH
SHARADA
RANGNATH WAHULE
WAHULE Date:
Adv. Atithi Abhay SPP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
2026.09.03
14:11:12
+0530
Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State.
****
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL AND
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.:
1. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, on
instructions, makes a statement that the Look-Out Circular (LOC) issued
against the Petitioner in the present matter has been deleted. The said
statement is recorded and accepted.
2. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the present Petition.
The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
3. Along with the connected application, the Petition also stands
disposed of.
( RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1
Sharada
Checking your session…