Bombay High Court

Deepak Balakrishna SalveversusThe state of Maharashtra

Decided: 2 February 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off
Bench: SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Holding

The order must be corrected to include the name of the advocate for Respondent No.2.

Summary

The applicants filed an interim application seeking correction of the order dated 02.02.2026, wherein the name of the advocate for Respondent No.2 was omitted. The Court examined the praecipe and noted the omission. It held that the order must accurately reflect the appearance of counsel and therefore directed that the advocate’s name, Ms. Surbhi S. Agrawal, be inserted. The Court ordered the necessary correction in the original order and its upload. The praecipe was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the order dated 02.02.2026 should be corrected to show the name of the advocate for Respondent No.2?

Subjects

procedural correction
order amendment
appearance of counsel
criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                                        501-IA-3188-2025 .doc


                            S.S.Kilaje


                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3188 OF 2025
                                                               IN
                                           REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 17122 OF 2025

                            Deepak Balakrishna Salve & Ors.                            ….Applicants

                            Versus
         Digitally signed
SONALI   by SONALI
         SATISH KILAJE
SATISH
KILAJE
         Date:
         2026.02.06
         14:57:37
         +0700
                            The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                      …..Respondents
                            _________________________________________________________________
                            None for Applicants.
                            Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State.
                            Ms. Surbhi S. Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                            _________________________________________________________________

                                                                     CORAM      :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                     DATE       :   5th FEBRUARY, 2026.
                            P.C. :

                            1.            Perused the praecipe dated 05.02.2026 for speaking to minutes

                            of order dated 02.02.2026.

                            2.            In the Order dated 02.02.2026, the name of Advocate for

                            respondent No.2 is not shown.

                            3.            In view thereof, “Ms. Surbhi S. Agrawal, Advocate for

                            Respondent No.2” be shown in the appearance of order dated 02.02.2026.

                            4.            Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order and

                            the corrected order be uploaded.

                            5.            Praecipe is disposed of.

                                                                              (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
                                                                Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…