Bombay High Court

KAMLESH JAYSUKHLAL BHUTAversusBHANUMATI JAYSUKHLAL BHUTA AND ORS.

Decided: 30 September 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The interim application is allowed, permitting the amendment of the petition.

Summary

Kamlesh Jaysukhlal Bhuta filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 1009 of 2018 seeking permission to make a consequential amendment to his petition. The applicant was represented by Mr. Jimish Shah, while the respondents – the State and a private respondent – were represented by Mr. Himanshu Takke, A.G.P., and Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal respectively. The High Court examined whether the reasons given in the interim application justified allowing the amendment. The Court held that the reasons were sufficient and allowed the interim application. Accordingly, the Court directed the applicant to file the amended petition within two weeks, to serve a copy on the opposite side, and disposed of the interim application.

Issues considered

Whether the interim application seeking permission to amend the writ petition should be allowed

Subjects

interim relief
petition amendment
Civil Procedure Code
High Court of Bombay
writ petition

Judgment

                                                                22-IA-32-2025.doc


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                     INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2025
                                     IN
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 1009 OF 2018

Kamlesh Jaysukhlal Bhuta                                   .....Applicant
            Versus
Bhanumati Jaysukhlal Bhuta & Ors.                          .....Respondents
                                 .....
Mr. Jimish Shah, for the Applicant.

Mr. Himanshu Takke, A.G.P, for the Respondent-State.

Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal for the Respondent – SRA.
                               ..…
                           CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                    SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
                                DATE     : 30th SEPTEMBER 2026


P.C.:-

1.       For the reasons mentioned in the interim application, the

application is allowed.        The applicant to carry out consequential

amendment in the petition within two weeks from today.


2.       Amended copy of the petition be served on the other side.


3.       Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.



(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                             (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Wakodikar                                                                   1/1
            Digitally signed
            by RUPALI
RUPALI      RAJESH
RAJESH      WAKODIKAR
WAKODIKAR   Date:
            2026.10.03
            10:07:33 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.