Bombay High Court

VIJAY LEKHRAJ JEVRANI AND 2 ORSversusVIJAY KANHAIYALAL HARAN AND ANR

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

No error apparent on the face of the record; the review petition is dismissed.

Summary

The applicants filed a review petition (Stamp) No. 1836 of 2026 challenging the order dated 18 November 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court. An interim application (No. 347 of 2026) was filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the review petition, which the Court granted. The Court examined whether any error apparent on the face of the record existed in the impugned order. It held that the order was specific and there was no apparent error warranting interference. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether the delay in filing the review petition can be condoned.
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 18 November 2025.

Subjects

review petition
condonation of delay
error apparent
civil appellate jurisdiction
high court order

Judgment

                                                                2-ia 347-26.doc

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE


                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2026
                                   IN
                REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 1836 OF 2026
                                   IN
                    WRIT PETITION NO. 12233 OF 2025

Vijay Lekhraj Jevrani & Ors.                                … Applicants
        Versus
Vijay Kanhaiyalal Haran & Anr.                              ... Respondents
                       __________________________

Mr. S. R. Ganbawale (through VC) i/b Mr. P. R. Raorane for the Applicants.
Mr. Dheeraj Patil (through VC) for the Respondents.
                       __________________________

                                  CORAM      : M. S. KARNIK AND
                                               AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
                                  DATED      : 25th AUGUST, 2026.
                                  (Through Video Conferencing)

P.C. :

Interim Application No. 347 of 2026

1.       For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the

review petition is condoned.

2.       The application is disposed of.

Review Petition (Stamp) No. 1836 of 2026

3.       The Order dated 18th November, 2025 passed by this Court is very

specific.    We have clearly observed that the action has to be taken in

accordance with law.

 Amk                                                                   1/2
                                                                 2-ia 347-26.doc

4.     It is always open for the review petitioner to raise all his permissible

objections so as to ensure that the authority acts in conformity with the

provisions of law.

5.     We do not find any error apparent on the face of record to warrant

interference in the review jurisdiction of this Court. Hence, the review

petition is dismissed.



(AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.)                                  (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




 Amk                                                                    2/2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…