Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAMTA S SAINIversusDHAKSHINAMOORTHY RAMAMOORTHY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The interim application is disposed as no further order is required.

Summary

Mrs. Mamta S. Saini filed an interim application in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2771 of 2023. The respondents informed the Court that the matter was scheduled before the trial Court for final arguments. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that no further order was required on the interim application. The Court noted the status of the main proceedings and held that there was no necessity to pass any additional order. Consequently, the interim application was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether any further order is required on the interim application in view of the trial Court being fixed for final arguments?

Subjects

  • interim application
  • procedural order
  • final arguments
  • trial court
  • disposal

Judgment

                      P.H. JAYANI                                             501 IA3511.2026.DOC


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3511 OF 2026
                                                     IN
                                    CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2771 OF 2023

                      Mrs. Mamta S. Saini                                     …. Applicant
                           V/s.
                      Mr. Dhakshinamoorthy Ramamoorthy and Ors.            …Respondents


                      Ms. Aashi Narayan i/b. Adv. Vighneshwar Subramanian for the
                      Applicant in IA/3511/2026.
                      Ms. S.K. Gajare, APP for Respondent No.6 – State.
                      Mr. Robin Thomas for the other Respondents.



                                                  CORAM:       SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                                                  DATED :      6th OCTOBER, 2026

                      P.C. :-

                      1.        Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production
                      board.

                      2.        Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

                      3.        Mr. Thomas, the learned Counsel for the Respondents /
                      original Petitioners states that, today, the matter is fixed before
                      the trial Court for final arguments.

                      4.        Hence, no further Orders are required in this case and the
                      Interim Application stands disposed of, accordingly.



  PREETI
  HEERO                                                (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
  JAYANI
Digitally signed by
PREETI HEERO
JAYANI
Date: 2026.10.07
18:49:01 +0530




                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.