Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAHAJI LALA PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the 45‑day delay in filing the appeal may be condoned and allowed the application.

Summary

The appellant, Shahaji Lala Pawar, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 45‑day delay in filing an appeal against his conviction. The High Court issued notice to the respondents on 9 July 2026 and heard arguments from both sides. The applicant was represented by Mr. Ishaan Kapse, while the State was represented by Mr. Shrikant H. Yadav, APP. After considering the reasons set out in the application, the Court allowed the condonation of delay as per prayer clause (c). Consequently, the application was disposed of in favor of the appellant, permitting the appeal to proceed. No substantive discussion of statutory provisions or precedents was recorded in the short order.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 45 days in filing an appeal against conviction can be condoned under the procedural law.

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • criminal appeal
  • procedural law
  • appeal against conviction

Judgment

                                                                                     19-IA-352-2026.doc


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 352 OF 2026
                                                           IN
                                          CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 2096 OF 2026

                        Shahaji Lala Pawar                       ...Applicant.

                        In the Matter in Between :
                        Shahaji Lala Pawar               ...Appellant.
                                Versus
                        State of Maharashtra and Another ...Respondents.
                                                    ——————
                        Mr. Ishaan Kapse for the Applicant.
                        Mr. Shrikant H. Yadav, APP, for the Respondents-State.
                                                          ——————
                                                            Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                        Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                            Date      : September 15, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        This is an application for condonation of 45 days delay in iling

                        appeal against conviction.

                        2.        This Court had issued notice to the Respondents on 9th July 2026.

                        3.        Heard both the sides.

                        4.        After hearing both the sides and for the reasons set out in the

                        application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c).

                        5.        The Application is disposed of.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                          [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:        Gaikwad RD                           1 of 1
           2026.09.15
           15:14:04
           +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.