Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJEEV LALCHAND GOYALversusSANJAY D GUPTA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

No substantive decision was made; the matter was adjourned to a later date.

Summary

The Bombay High Court heard a criminal revision application filed by Rajeev Lalchand Goyal against Sanjay D. Gupta and others. Counsel for both sides appeared before Justice Shivkumar Dige. No substantive arguments on the merits were recorded, and the court ordered that the matter be stood over to a later date. The next hearing was fixed for 12 October 2026. No decision on the revision was rendered at this stage.

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • adjournment
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                 Board Sr.No.:-15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
    APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

      CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 399 OF 2022

Rajeev Lalchand Goyal               ....APPLICANT
            V/S
Sanjay D Gupta And Anr            ....RESPONDENT

                        WITH
   CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1262 OF 2026
                          In
          Cr. Revision Appln. 399 OF 2022

Rajeev Lalchand Goyal               ....PETITIONER
            V/S
Sanjay D Gupta                    ....RESPONDENT

                        WITH
   CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3596 OF 2022
                          In
          Cr. Revision Appln. 399 OF 2022

Rajeev Lalchand Goyal               ....PETITIONER
            V/S
Sanjay D Gupta And Anr            ....RESPONDENT

                        WITH
   CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3597 OF 2022
                          In
          Cr. Revision Appln. 399 OF 2022

Rajeev Lalchand Goyal               ....PETITIONER


                                                     Page 1/3
           V/S
Sanjay D Gupta And Anr                    ....RESPONDENT

                        WITH
   CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4541 OF 2022
                          In
          Cr. Revision Appln. 399 OF 2022

Rajeev Lalchand Goyal                       ....PETITIONER
            V/S
Sanjay D. Gupta And Anr.                  ....RESPONDENT

                        WITH
   CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 974 OF 2026
                          In
          Cr. Revision Appln. 399 OF 2022

Rajeev Lalchand Goyal                       ....PETITIONER
            V/S
Sanjay D Gupta                            ....RESPONDENT

Adv. Ms.Chaula Solanki, a/w Adv. Niranjana Pradhan, Adv. H
H Nagi, i/b Nagi & Associates for Applicant
Ashok Sarvni for Respondent
Swapnil S. Pednekar App

    CORAM :       HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
                  J
    DATE :        28th September, 2026




                                                             Page 2/3
P.C. :
  Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. At
  the     request       of      learned    counsel   for      the
  appellant(s)/petitioner(s)/respondent(s) No., stand over to
  12/10/2026.



                             ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )




                                                                    Page 3/3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.