Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHANDERLATA GOSAIversusCSB BANK LTD

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The court held that no further orders were necessary and allowed the interim application to be withdrawn.

Summary

Chanderlata Gosai filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 5127 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court. The respondent, CSB Bank Ltd, informed the court that it had taken possession of the subject premises on 11 May 2026. The court considered whether any further interim relief was required in view of the possession being taken. It held that no additional orders were necessary at this stage. Consequently, the applicant was permitted to withdraw the interim application, which was disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application if needed.

Issues considered

  • Whether any further interim relief is required after the respondent has taken possession of the premises
  • Whether the interim application should be allowed to be withdrawn

Subjects

  • interim application
  • possession
  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

PALLAVI
MAHENDRA                                                                              6-IA-3618-2026 (C) .doc
WARGAONKAR

Digitally signed by
PALLAVI MAHENDRA
WARGAONKAR
Date: 2026.05.13
20:08:12 +0530
                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3618 OF 2026
                                                         IN
                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 5127 OF 2026

                       Chanderlata Gosai                                        ...Applicant

                               Versus

                       CSB Bank Ltd                                             ...Respondent

                                                      __________
                       Adv. H.E. Palwe i/b. Abdul Shaikh, for the Applicant.
                       Mr. Alok D. Mishra, for the Respondent- CSB.
                                                      __________

                                                  CORAM :         ADVAIT M. SETHNA &
                                                                  SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                                  DATE      :     13 MAY 2026
                                                                  (VACATION COURT)

                       P.C.:

                       1.      Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel

                       for the Original Petitioner and the Respondent in the said Interim

                       Application, on instructions, states that the possession of the subject

                       premises has already been taken over on 11 May 2026 by the said

                       Respondents.

                       2.      In   view   thereof,   at   this   stage,   no    further    orders     are

                       necessary/required.

                       3.      In view of the above, the learned counsel for the Applicant seeks

                       to withdraw this Interim Application. Leave granted.

             Pallavi                                                                               Page 1 of 2
                                                                   6-IA-3618-2026 (C) .doc


          4.    Interim Application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file

          fresh Interim Application, considering the subsequent developments.



          [SANDESH D. PATIL, J]                [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]




Pallavi                                                                         Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.