Bombay High Court
DYANOBA NAMDEV JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court allowed the complainant to intervene in the bail application.
Summary
The complainant, Dyanoba Namdev Jadahv, filed an interim application seeking to intervene in Criminal Bail Application No.443 of 2026, which concerns the original accused Ankush Tukaram Jadhav. The accused's counsel and the State's counsel did not oppose the intervention. The court examined whether the complainant, as the informant in Crime No.484 of 2023, could be allowed to intervene in the bail proceedings. Finding no objection and recognizing the complainant's interest, the court permitted the intervention. Consequently, the accused's counsel was granted permission to amend the bail application to reflect the complainant as an intervener, and the interim application was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the complainant/informant can be permitted to intervene in a criminal bail application
Subjects
- criminal bail
- intervention
- interim application
- bail amendment
Judgment
Digitally signed
by LAXMIKANT
LAXMIKANT GOPAL (26) IA-374.26.DOCX
GOPAL CHANDAN
CHANDAN Date:
2026.08.18
18:52:32 +0530 lgc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.374 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.443 OF 2026
Dyanoba Namdev Jadahv : Applicant/Intervener
In the matter between
Ankush Tukaram Jadhav : Applicant/Orig.Accused
Versus
State of Maharashtra and anr. : Respondents.
______________________________________________________
Mr. Laxman Kalal for the Applicant/Intervener.
Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi i/by Mr. Abhishek Avachat for the
Applicant/Original Accused.
Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State.
______________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED : 18 AUGUST 2026
PC:-
1. By the present Interim Application, the
Complainant/Informant is seeking intervention in Criminal Bail
Application No.443 of 2026.
2. Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi, learned Advocate for the
Applicant/Original Accused and Mr. N. B. Patil, learned APP for the
1
(26) IA-374.26.DOCX
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, do not oppose the request for
intervention by the Complainant/Informant.
3. In view of the no objection and considering the Intervener to
be the Complainant/Informant on whose behalf Crime No.484 of
2023 was registered, this Interim Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clause (a). Intervener is permitted to intervene in Criminal
Bail Application No.443 of 2026.
4. Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi, learned Advocate for the
Applicant/Original Accused requests for permission to carry out
the amendment forthwith to show the Complainant/Informant as
Intervener in Criminal Bail Application No.443 of 2026. Permission
granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
5. Interim Application No.374 of 2026 is disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
2
Checking your session…